Correction

Kuroda S, Sugahara T, Takabatake S, Taketa H, Ando R, Takano-Yamamoto T. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:73-8. The table cited in this article was not published. We apologize for the error.

Table
Comparison of soft-tissue evaluations
Variable B-5 Control M-5 M-10 M+5 B-10 B+5 M+10 B+10 Japanese norm SD
Burstone analysis
Soft-tissue convexity (Gn′-Sn-Pog′) 15.0 11.1 15.0 17.8 7.4 17.8 7.4 3.0 3.0 13.2 a 4.9
Upper lip protrusion (Ls-Sn-Pog′) 6.2 5.9 6.2 7.5 4.5 7.5 4.5 4.8 4.0 6.5 a 1.5
Lower lip protrusion (Li-Sn-Pog′) 4.0 5.8 7.8 9.5 3.2 2.2 7.2 1.7 8.5 6.4 a 1.9
Holdaway analysis
H-angle (°) 18.0 15.0 18.0 21.4 10.8 21.4 10.8 7.2 7.2 15.5 b 4.3
H-line to subnasale (H-Sn) 9.5 8.0 9.5 10.2 7.0 10.2 7.0 5.8 5.8 9.1 b 2.9
H-line to lower lip (H-LL) 0.3 2.1 4.2 5.5 0.8 −2.0 4.2 −1.2 6.3 1.6 b 1.8
Ricketts analysis
E-plane to upper lip (E-UL) –1.8 –3.5 –1.8 –0.2 –5.2 –0.2 –4.9 –7.0 –6.5 –2.5 c 1.9
E-plane to lower lip (E-LL) –0.8 0.2 3.0 5.3 –2.0 –2.2 2.0 –5.2 3.2 0.9 c 1.9
Merrifield’s Z-angle (°) 65.4 65.4 57.8 48.9 74.1 65.4 65.4 83.8 65.4 66.6 a 7.1
Epker’s soft-tissue relationships
Subnasale perp-lower lip –3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 –8.0 2.8 0.0 7.5 1.63 b 3.3
Subnasale perp-chin –13.5 –10.0 –13.5 –17.5 –7.5 –17.5 –7.5 –3.0 –3.0 –6.98 b 4.7
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Apr 13, 2017 | Posted by in Orthodontics | Comments Off on Correction
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes