The accuracy of surface (/topical) anatomic landmarks in predicting the location of the greater auricular nerve: a prospective study

Introduction/aims: In this prospective study we present our clinical experience of the accuracy in predictions regarding the location of greater auricular nerve using topical anatomic landmarks.

Materials and methods: A total of 99 patients, in a three year, eight month period, between 1st January 2006 and 31st August 2009 were included in the study.

Inclusion criteria: All patients that required surgical approach using neck incisions that expose the greater auricular nerve. All procedures were carried out by same consultant and co-author (T. Lowe). Exclusion criteria: (1) Distorted topical anatomy – either due to previous surgery or voluminous pathology in the neck. (2) Patients requiring radical procedures due to advanced disease (head and neck cancer).

Results: The predictive calculations for the exact location of the greater auricular nerve were performed intra-operatively and tabulated. Details of patient demographics, indications for surgery, and validity of predictions are presented. Complete results of our study will be offered in our presentation.

Conclusion: Surface landmarks predicted the actual location of the greater auricular nerve with marked precision, in our study. We recommend their use in identification and preservation of the greater auricular nerve.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Jan 21, 2018 | Posted by in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Comments Off on The accuracy of surface (/topical) anatomic landmarks in predicting the location of the greater auricular nerve: a prospective study
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes