Kuroda S, Sugahara T, Takabatake S, Taketa H, Ando R, Takano-Yamamoto T. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:73-8. The table cited in this article was not published. We apologize for the error.
Table
Comparison of soft-tissue evaluations
| Variable | B-5 | Control | M-5 | M-10 | M+5 | B-10 | B+5 | M+10 | B+10 | Japanese norm | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burstone analysis | |||||||||||
| Soft-tissue convexity (Gn′-Sn-Pog′) | 15.0 ∗ | 11.1 ∗ | 15.0 ∗ | 17.8 ∗ | 7.4 | 17.8 ∗ | 7.4 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 13.2 a | 4.9 |
| Upper lip protrusion (Ls-Sn-Pog′) | 6.2 ∗ | 5.9 ∗ | 6.2 ∗ | 7.5 ∗ | 4.5 | 7.5 ∗ | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 6.5 a | 1.5 |
| Lower lip protrusion (Li-Sn-Pog′) | 4.0 ∗ | 5.8 ∗ | 7.8 ∗ | 9.5 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 7.2 ∗ | 1.7 | 8.5 | 6.4 a | 1.9 |
| Holdaway analysis | |||||||||||
| H-angle (°) | 18.0 ∗ | 15.0 ∗ | 18.0 ∗ | 21.4 | 10.8 | 21.4 | 10.8 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 15.5 b | 4.3 |
| H-line to subnasale (H-Sn) | 9.5 ∗ | 8.0 ∗ | 9.5 ∗ | 10.2 ∗ | 7.0 ∗ | 10.2 ∗ | 7.0 ∗ | 5.8 | 5.8 | 9.1 b | 2.9 |
| H-line to lower lip (H-LL) | 0.3 ∗ | 2.1 ∗ | 4.2 | 5.5 | 0.8 ∗ | −2.0 | 4.2 | −1.2 | 6.3 | 1.6 b | 1.8 |
| Ricketts analysis | |||||||||||
| E-plane to upper lip (E-UL) | –1.8 ∗ | –3.5 ∗ | –1.8 ∗ | –0.2 | –5.2 | –0.2 | –4.9 | –7.0 | –6.5 | –2.5 c | 1.9 |
| E-plane to lower lip (E-LL) | –0.8 ∗ | 0.2 ∗ | 3.0 | 5.3 | –2.0 | –2.2 | 2.0 ∗ | –5.2 | 3.2 | 0.9 c | 1.9 |
| Merrifield’s Z-angle (°) | 65.4 ∗ | 65.4 ∗ | 57.8 | 48.9 | 74.1 | 65.4 ∗ | 65.4 ∗ | 83.8 | 65.4 ∗ | 66.6 a | 7.1 |
| Epker’s soft-tissue relationships | |||||||||||
| Subnasale perp-lower lip | –3.7 | 0.0 ∗ | 0.0 ∗ | 0.0 ∗ | 0.0 ∗ | –8.0 | 2.8 ∗ | 0.0 ∗ | 7.5 | 1.63 b | 3.3 |
| Subnasale perp-chin | –13.5 | –10.0 ∗ | –13.5 | –17.5 | –7.5 ∗ | –17.5 | –7.5 ∗ | –3.0 ∗ | –3.0 ∗ | –6.98 b | 4.7 |
Stay updated, free dental videos. Join our Telegram channel
VIDEdental - Online dental courses
