Study
Country
n
Study type
Method of clinical assessment
Setting
Prevalence (%)
Peak of age
M:F ratio
Commonly affected teeth
% with GRa
Clayton et al. (2002)
UK
250
Qb
NAi
GDPf
50
3rd decade
1:1
Mandh right sextant
NA
Gillam et al. (2001)
UK and Korea
557
Q
NA
GDP
52–55.4
3rd–4th decades
NA
NA
NA
Gillam et al. (1999)
UK
277
Q
NA
GDP
52
3rd decade
1:1.4
NA
NA
Bamise et al. (2007)
Nigeria
2,165
Q + CEc
ABd/Probing
University
1.34
4th decade
1.4:1
Molars
12.8 %
Rees and Addy (2004)
UK
5,477
Q + CE
AB/PDAe
GDP
2.8
4th decade
1:1.5
Maxg 1st molars
93 %
Taani and Awartani (2001)
Saudi Arabia
259
Q + CE
AB/PDA
GDP
GDP 42.4
4th decade
GDP 1:4
Max molars and mand anteriors
5 %
Fischer et al. (1992)
Brazil
635
Q + CE
AB/Probing
Marine dental clinic
17
M: 6th, F: 3rd decade
1:1
Incisors and premolars
NA
Flynn et al. (1985)
Scotland
369
Q + CE
CWMRj/Probing
University
8.7
4th decade
1:1
Premolars
NA
Liu et al. (1998)
Taiwan
780
Q + CE
AB/Probing
University
32
NA
1:1
Premolars and molars
23 %
Amarasena et al. (2011)
Australia
12,692
Q + CE
NA
GDP
9.1
4th–5th decades
1:1.5
Max premolars and molars
39 %
Chrysanthakopoulos (2011)
Greece
1,450
Q + CE
AB
GDP
18.2
5th in males
7th in females
1:1.25
Premolars
85.9 %
Ye et al. (2012)
China
2,120
Q + CE
AB
GDP
34.1
5th decade
1:1.5
Premolars
84.3 %
Tengrungsun et al. (2012)
Thailand
420
Q + CE
AB
University
30.7
4th decade
1:2.4
1st molar
NA
Bahsi et al. (2012)
Turkey
1,368
Q + CE
AB/Probing
GDP
5.3
5th decade
1:2
Max premolars
88.4 %
Dhaliwal et al. (2012)
Punjab, India
650
Q + CE
AB
Screening participants in villages
25
6th decade
1:1.6
Mand incisors
NA
Cunha-Cruz et al. (2013)
USA
787
Q + CE
AB
GDP
12.3
18–44
1:2.6
Premolars and molars
85.6 %
Taking all this into consideration, it seems prudent to divide the prevalence of this condition into three categories: DH prevalence using surveys (around 50 %); DH prevalence diagnosed using combined surveys and clinical exams (15–20 %); and DH in patients who have periodontal disease or have been receiving periodontal treatment (60–90 %). Referring back to the definition of DH previously mentioned, the latest category might reflect a different etiology and should not be considered when reporting prevalence of the condition. Bacteria were reported to penetrate dentin to a considerable distance in periodontally diseased teeth (Adriaens et al. 1988). Such sensitivity of dentin therefore is a separate clinical entity possibly requiring different preventive and management strategies (Dababneh et al. 1999).