5: Dental plaque

Chapter 5 Dental plaque

Dental plaque is a general term for the complex microbial community that develops on the tooth surface, embedded in a matrix of polymers of bacterial and salivary origin. Plaque that becomes calcified is referred to as calculus or tartar. The presence of plaque in the mouth can readily be demonstrated by rinsing with a disclosing solution such as erythrosin (Fig. 5.1). The majority of plaque is found associated with the protected and stagnant regions of the tooth surface such as fissures, approximal regions between teeth, and the gingival crevice (see Figs 2.2 and 5.1). Plaque is found naturally on the tooth surface, and forms part of the host defences by excluding exogenous (and often pathogenic) species (colonization resistance) (Table 4.7). On occasions, however, plaque can accumulate beyond levels compatible with oral health, and this can lead to shifts in the composition of the microflora and predispose sites to disease (Ch. 6). Dental plaque is an example of a biofilm and a microbial community, and the significance of this will be explained in the following sections.

image image

Fig. 5.1 Visualization of dental plaque after staining with a disclosing solution. (A) Plaque is typically located at retention and stagnation areas along the gingival margin and between teeth (approximal areas). (B) Heavy accumulation of plaque on the occlusal surface of an erupting third molar; plaque is preferentially located in the fissures.

Taken from Marsh PD & Nyvad B, The oral microflora and biofilms on teeth, in dental caries. The disease and its clinical management, 2nd edn, Fejerskov O and Kidd EAM, Blackwell, Oxford, 2008; pp.163–187 – published with permission.

Microbial biofilms

Numerous studies of a range of distinct ecosystems have shown that the vast majority of microorganisms exist in nature associated with a surface. The term ‘biofilm’ is used to describe communities of microorganisms attached to a surface; such microbes are usually spatially organized into a three-dimensional structure and are enclosed in a matrix of extracellular material (sometimes termed a ‘glycocalyx’) derived both from the cells themselves and from their environment. If (a) biofilm microbes were simply planktonic (liquid-phase) cells that had adhered to a surface, and (b) the properties of microbial communities were merely the sum of those of the constitutive populations, then scientific interest in such issues would be limited. However, research over recent years has revealed that cells growing as biofilms have unique properties, some of which are of clinical significance (Table 5.1), for example, biofilms can be up to 1000 times more tolerant of antimicrobial agents than the same cells growing in liquid culture, while communities of interacting species can be more pathogenic than pure cultures of the constituent microorganisms.

Table 5.1 General properties of biofilms and microbial communities.

General property Dental plaque example
Open architecture presence of channels and voids
Protection from host defences, desiccation, etc production of extracellular polymers to form a functional matrix; physical protection from phagocytosis
Enhanced tolerance to antimicrobials* reduced sensitivity to chlorhexidine and antibiotics; gene transfer
Neutralization of inhibitors β-lactamase production by neighbouring cells to protect sensitive organisms
Novel gene expression* synthesis of novel proteins on attachment; up-regulation of gtfBC in mature biofilms
Coordinated gene responses production of cell-cell signalling molecules (e.g. CSP, AI-2)
Spatial & environmental heterogeneity pH & O2 gradients; coadhesion
Broader habitat range obligate anaerobes in an overtly aerobic environment
More efficient metabolism complete catabolism of complex host macromolecules (e.g. mucins) by microbial consortia
Enhanced virulence pathogenic synergism in abscesses and periodontal diseases

* one consequence of altered gene expression can also be an increased tolerance of antimicrobial agents.

Originally, biofilms were considered to be dense, compressed accumulations of cells, and this compacted structure was believed to be responsible for many of the novel properties of biofilms. Recent advances in the study of biofilms have come from the application of novel techniques that enable biofilms to be studied in situ without any processing of samples that could distort their structure. A prime example has been the use of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to study biofilm architecture without chemical fixation or embedding techniques. Optical thin sections can be generated throughout the depth of the biofilm, and these can be combined using imaging software to generate three-dimensional images. In addition, the location of specific organisms can be visualized with immunological or oligonucleotide probes, such as by fluorescent in situ hybridization, FISH, (Fig. 3.3), while other molecular probes can indicate the vitality and metabolic activity of cells. CLSM can also be used in combination with ‘reporter genes’ to identify genes that are expressed only when cells form a biofilm. This technology involves the insertion of a marker into the bacterial chromosome downstream of a promoter so that a recognisable ‘signal’ (e.g. fluorescence) is produced when the gene is activated.

The application of these modern approaches to the general field of microbial ecology has shown that biofilms that develop in low-nutrient environments, especially those from aquatic habitats, have a more open structure than had been predicted previously from earlier studies employing electron microscopy. Channels have been observed in biofilms of environmental bacteria, enabling potentially growth-limiting factors such as nutrients and oxygen to penetrate more extensively than previously thought. In addition, the use of micro-electrodes and chemical probes have shown that considerable gradients in key factors (pH, redox potential, etc.) can occur over relatively short distances (a few microns, i.e. a few cell diameters) within biofilms. This produces spatial and temporal heterogeneity within the biofilm enabling fastidious bacteria to survive in apparently hostile or incompatible environments (Table 5.1).

A biofilm life-style may affect the properties of an organism in more than one way. Firstly, the attachment of cells to a surface may cause a direct effect, perhaps by triggering ‘sensors’ on the cell surface, and specifically inducing the expression of a subset of genes. Bacteria are able to sense their environment via membrane-bound two component signal transduction pathways consisting of a sensor histidine kinase and a response regulator. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an environmental bacterium that can also act as an opportunistic pathogen, for example, in cystic fibrosis. Attachment leads to the up-regulation of genes (algC and algG) involved in exopolysaccharide (alginate) synthesis within 15 minutes of the initial contact of a cell with a surface. Secondly, the growth environment within the biofilm may differ significantly in respect to key factors (pH, oxygen and nutrient concentration) compared with planktonic culture. Again, this may result in altered gene expression, and hence an altered phenotype, but as an indirect effect of growing in a biofilm. Likewise, organisms in a biofilm will be growing more slowly, due to a particular nutrient limitation or an unfavourable pH, and this will also affect the properties of a cell. Often, it is difficult to resolve whether any observed phenotypic changes are due to the direct or indirect effects of being in a biofilm. For most practical purposes, the reasons for any change are less important than the biological significance of the change itself.

Biofilm bacteria are phenotypically distinct from planktonic cells, and one particularly important aspect of this is an increased tolerance of biofilm cells to antimicrobial agents. An extreme example was the finding that P. aeruginosa growing on urinary catheter material was between 500–1000 times more tolerant of the antibiotic, tobramycin, than the same cells in liquid (planktonic) culture. Conventionally, the sensitivity of bacteria to antimicrobial agents is determined on cells grown in liquid culture by the measurement of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or minimum bacteriocidal concentration (MBC) against relevant antimicrobial agents. Given the decreased sensitivity of an organism on a surface to antimicrobial agents, it has been argued that it would be more appropriate to determine the ‘biofilm inhibitory concentration (BIC)’ and ‘biofilm killing concentration (BKC)’ or ‘biofilm eradicating concentration (BEC)’. As yet, these proposals have not been widely accepted, and there are no generally agreed methods by which these concentrations could be determined.

Microorganisms can become resistant to antibiotics due to mutations, the presence of drug efflux pumps and the production of neutralizing enzymes, but even innately sensitive organisms become apparently ‘resistant’ when growing on a surface in a biofilm. The mechanisms behind the increased tolerance of biofilms to antimicrobial agents are still not fully understood; a number of theories have been proposed, the relative significance or contribution of each may vary according to (a) the age, structure and location of the biofilm, and (b) the chemical properties of the agent. The structure of a biofilm may restrict the penetration of an antimicrobial agent; for example, positively-charged antibiotics such as aminoglycosides will bind to negatively-charged polymers that are present as part of the extracellular matrix (diffusion-reaction theory). Agents may also bind to and inhibit the organisms at the surface of the biofilm, leaving cells in the depths of the biofilm relatively unaffected, i.e. the agent is quenched at the surface. As stated earlier, microbes growing as a biofilm display a novel phenotype, and one possible consequence of this can be a reduced sensitivity to antimicrobial agents. The drug target may be modified or not expressed during growth on a surface, or the organism may use alternative biochemical strategies thereby diminishing the potential impact of the active agent. Cells also grow much slower in a mature biofilm and, as a consequence, are much less susceptible to antimicrobials than faster growing cells. The environment in the depths of a biofilm may also be unfavourable for the optimal action of some antimicrobial agents. In multi-species biofilms, a susceptible pathogen can be rendered resistant if neighbouring, non-pathogenic cells produce a neutralizing or drug-degrading enzyme – this is sometimes referred to as ‘indirect pathogenicity’. In addition, biofilms provide ideal conditions for the transfer of resistance genes, e.g. via plasmids, among neighbouring cells in close proximity to one another (horizontal gene transfer).

Biofilms in the mouth

Dental plaque was probably the first biofilm to have been studied in terms of either its microbial composition or its sensitivity to antimicrobial agents. In the seventeenth century, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek pioneered the approach of studying biofilms by direct microscopic observation when he reported on the diversity and high numbers of ‘animalcules’ present in ‘scrapings’ taken from around human teeth. He also conducted early studies on the novel properties of surface-grown cells when he failed to kill plaque bacteria on his teeth by prolonged rinsing with wine-vinegar, while the organisms were ‘killed’ if they were first removed from his molars and mixed with vinegar in vitro.

Dental plaque is one of the best studied biofilms, and displays all of the characteristic features of a typical biofilm (Table 5.1). Compared to other habitats, dental plaque is relatively accessible for sampling, and can even be grown on relevant removable surfaces for subsequent investigation and experimentation in the laboratory (in situ models; Ch. 4). A large proportion of the key microorganisms can be identified, while the phenotype of such microbes (adhesins, metabolic potential, cell–cell interactions) is well-characterized. Extensive biofilms also develop on dentures, and the tongue. On other mucosal surfaces, bacteria attach to epithelial cells and may develop a surface-associated phenotype, but extensive 3-dimensional biofilms do not usually develop. Another dentally-relevant biofilm develops on the tubing used in dental unit water supply systems (DUWS); this will be discussed in Chapter 12 (see Fig. 12.6), but the principles governing the formation and properties of these biofilms will be similar to those described below for dental plaque.

Mechanisms of dental plaque formation

The development of a biofilm such as dental plaque can be subdivided arbitrarily into several stages. As a bacterium approaches a surface a number of specific and non-specific interactions will occur between the substratum and the cell, and these will determine whether successful attachment and colonization will take place. Distinct stages in plaque formation are summarized below, and are shown schematically in Fig. 5.2.

However, it should be remembered that biofilm formation is a dynamic process and the phases distinguished above are only arbitrary and are for the benefit of discussion. The attachment, growth, removal and reattachment of bacteria are continuous processes, and a microbial biofilm such as plaque will undergo continuous reorganization.

1 Acquired pellicle formation

Bacteria rarely come into contact with clean enamel. As soon as a tooth surface is cleaned, salivary proteins and glycoproteins are adsorbed forming a surface conditioning film which is termed the acquired enamel pellicle. The major constituents of pellicle are salivary glycoproteins, phosphoproteins and lipids, including statherin, amylase, proline-rich peptides (PRPs) and host defence components (Chs 2 and 4). Bacterial components such as glucosyltransferases (GTFs) and glucan have also been detected in pellicle, and play a significant role in attachment. Depending on the site, pellicle can also contain components from gingival crevicular fluid (GCF).

Pellicle formation starts within seconds of a clean surface being exposed to the oral environment. An equilibrium between adsorption and desorption of salivary molecules occurs after 90–120 minutes. The thickness of the pellicle is influenced by the shear forces at the site of formation. After 2 hours, the pellicle on lingual surfaces is 20–80 nm thick whereas buccal pellicles can be 200–700 nm deep. Depending on the site, further increases in depth can occur over time. Pellicle has an electron dense basal layer covered by a more loosely arranged globular surface (Fig. 5.3). When salivary molecules bind to the tooth surface, they can undergo conformational changes. This can lead to exposure of new receptors for bacterial attachment (cryptitopes; see later) or, in the case of glucosyltransferases, an altered activity resulting in the synthesis of a glucan with a modified structure. The molecular composition and physicochemical properties of pellicle are critical in determining the pattern of microbial colonization.

2 Transport of microorganisms and reversible attachment

Microorganisms are generally transported passively to the tooth surface by the flow of saliva; few oral bacterial species are motile (e.g. possess flagella), and these are mainly located subgingivally.

As the cell approaches the pellicle-coated surface, long range but relatively weak physicochemical forces are generated. Microorganisms are negatively-charged due to the molecules on their cell surface, while many proteins present in the acquired pellicle also have a net negative charge. The Derjaguin and Landau and the Verwey and Overbeek (DLVO) theory has been used to describe the interaction between an inert particle (as a microorganism might be envisaged at large separation distances) and a substratum. This theory states that the total interactive energy, VT, of two smooth particles is determined solely by the sum of the van der Waals attractive energy (VA) and the usually repulsive, electrostatic energy (VR). Particles in aqueous suspension and surfaces in contact with aqueous solutions can acquire a charge due to, for example, the preferential adsorption of ions from solution or the ionization of certain groups attached to the particle or surface. The charge on a surface in solution is always exactly balanced by an equivalent number of counter ions; the size of this electrical double layer is inversely proportional to the ionic strength of the environment. As a particle approaches a surface, therefore, it experiences a weak van der Waals attraction induced by the fluctuating dipoles within the molecules of the two approaching surfaces. This attraction increases as the particle moves closer to the substratum. A repulsive force is encountered if the surfaces continue to approach each other, due to the overlap of the electrical double layers. Curves can be plotted to show the variation of the total interactive energy, VT, of a particle and a surface with the separation distance, h (Fig. 5.4). A net attraction can occur at two values of h; these are referred to as the primary minimum (h very small) and the secondary minimum (h = 10–20 nm) and are separated by a repulsive maximum. The reversible nature of these initial interactions suggests that the primary minimum is not usually encountered while the high ionic strength of saliva increases the likelihood that oral bacteria could be retained near a surface by a secondary minimum area of attraction (e.g. about 10–20 nm from the surface).

3 Pioneer microbial colonizers and irreversible attachment (adhesin–receptor interactions)

Within a short time, these weak physicochemical interactions may become irreversible due to adhesins on the microbial cell surface becoming involved in specific, short-range interactions with complementary receptors in the acquired pellicle. For this to occur, water films must be removed from between the interacting surfaces. A major role of cell hydrophobicity and hydrophobic cell surface components is their dehydrating effect on this water film enabling the surfaces to get closer so that the short range interactions can occur. A direct relationship between the degree of cell surface hydrophobicity and the adhesion of oral bacteria to saliva-coated surfaces has often been demonstrated.

Irrespective of the type of tooth surface (enamel or cementum), the initial colonizers constitute a highly selected part of the oral microflora. Within minutes, coccal bacteria appear on the surface (Fig. 5.5A), and these pioneer organisms are mainly streptococci, especially members of the mitis-group of streptococci (e.g. S. sanguinis, S. oralis and S. mitis biovar 1) (Table 5.2). Streptococcus sanguinis and S. oralis produce an IgA1 protease which may help them to survive and overcome a key element of the host defences during the early stages of plaque formation. Actinomyces spp. are also commonly isolated after 2 hours, as are Haemophilus spp. and Neisseria spp., while obligately anaerobic species are detected only rarely at this stage and are usually in low numbers. Some aggregates of mixtures of cells may also attach.

Once attached, these pioneer populations start to divide and form microcolonies; these early colonizers become embedded in bacterial extracellular slimes and polysaccharides together with additional layers of adsorbed salivary proteins and glycoproteins (Fig. 5.5, B and C). The early streptoccocal colonizers (mitis-group of streptococci) possess a range of glycosidase activities that enable them to interact and use salivary glycoproteins as substrates (Ch. 4; see Fig. 5.13 later). The fastest rates of multiplication occur during these early stages of plaque formation; the doubling times of pure cultures of S. mutans and A. naeslundii were 1.4 h and 2.7 hours, respectively, in studies using rodents.

The irreversible attachment of cells to the tooth involves specific, short range, stereochemical interactions between components on the microbial cell surface (adhesins) and complementary receptors in the acquired pellicle. These specific interactions contribute to the often observed associations (tropisms; Ch. 4) of certain organisms with a particular surface or habitat.

image

Several examples of these molecular interactions have been characterized, and some are listed in Table 5.3. Other examples of adhesins and their complementary receptors are described in Chapter 4. As examples, adhesins on S. gordonii can bind to α-amylase, while A. naeslundii and F. nucleatum interact with statherin. Streptococcus mutans (but not S. sobrinus), P. gingivalis, P. loescheii and P. melaninogenica adhere preferentially to hydroxyapatite coated with PRPs, although different regions of the molecule bind to particular organisms. Colonization by S. sobrinus is more dependent on sucrose-mediated mechanisms, including the interaction of glucans with receptors such as glucan binding proteins. Some adhesion mechanisms involve lectin-like bacterial proteins which interact with carbohydrates, or oligosaccharides, on glycoproteins adsorbed to the tooth surface. Thus, S. sanguinis can bind to terminal sialic acid residues in adsorbed salivary glycoproteins, while S. oralis expresses either a galactose-binding lectin or a lectin that interacts with a trisaccharide structure containing sialic acid, galactose and N-acetylgalactosamine.

Table 5.3 Some examples of host-bacterial interactions involved in adhesion.

Bacterium Adhesin Receptor
Streptococcus spp. antigen 1/11 salivary agglutinin
Streptococcus spp. LTA blood group reactive glycoproteins
Mutans streptococci glucan binding protein glucan
Streptococcus parasanguinis 35 kDa lipoprotein fibrin, pellicle
Actinomyces naeslundii type 1 fimbriae proline-rich proteins
Porphyromonas gingivalis 150 kDa protein fibrinogen
Prevotella loescheii 70 kDa lectin galactose
Fusobacterium nucleatum 42 kDa protein coaggregation with Porphyromonas gingivalis

Actinomyces spp. have two antigenically and functionally distinct types of fimbriae; type 1 fimbriae mediate bacterial adherence to PRPs and to statherin (a protein-protein interaction), whereas type 2 fimbriae are associated with a lactose-sensitive mechanism (a lectin-like activity) involving the adherence of cells to already attached bacteria (coadhesion; see later in this section) or to buccal epithelial cells.

A number of proteins in the cell walls of streptococci have been identified as adhesins. A high molecular weight protein from S. mutans, (termed antigen I/II, B, P1 or Pac), interacts with salivary agglutinins. Antibody directed against this surface molecule can block the adhesion of S. mutans to saliva-coated surfaces. The large size of some of the bacterial cell wall proteins means that they may be involved in more than one function. For example, a protein of S. gordonii can interact both with salivary proteins and with A. naeslundii (coaggregation). Some of the other adhesins found on S. sanguinis and S. gordonii are now known to be lipoproteins (Ch. 4). Streptococci can use multiple adhesins to bind to saliva-coated surfaces; as an example, S. sanguinis can adhere via lectin-like, hydrophobic and/or specific protein (adhesin) interactions.

A critical factor in plaque formation concerns the site at which the specific interactions between bacterial adhesins and host receptors take place. The host-derived receptors reside on molecules that are not only adsorbed to the tooth surface but which are also freely accessible in solution in saliva. Some of these molecules are designed to aggregate bacteria in solution, thereby facilitating their removal from the mouth by swallowing (see Ch. 2). For plaque formation to proceed, however, it is implicit that not all bacteria are aggregated in saliva before they reach the tooth surface. A novel mechanism may function to overcome this problem. It was found that although A. naeslundii could bind to the acidic PRPs when the latter were bound to a surface, cells did not interact with these proteins in solution. It has been proposed that hidden molecular segments of PRPs become exposed only when the proteins are adsorbed to hydroxyapatite, as a result of conformational changes. Such hidden receptors for bacterial adhesins have been termed ‘cryptitopes’. In this way, a selective mechanism for facilitating natural plaque formation has evolved by which the host can promote the attachment of specific bacteria without compromising this process in the planktonic phase. Adhesins which recognise cryptitopes in surface-associated molecules would provide a strong selective advantage for any microorganism which colonizes a mucosal or tooth surface. Another example of a cryptitope involving conformational change is the binding of members of the mitis-group of streptococci to fibronectin when complexed to collagen but not to fibronectin in solution. This might also be a mechanism enabling certain oral streptococci to colonize dam/>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Jan 5, 2015 | Posted by in General Dentistry | Comments Off on 5: Dental plaque
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes