3.6: All-ceramic restorations: High-strength core ceramics

Chapter 3.6

All-ceramic restorations

High-strength core ceramics

Introduction

The work by Land in the early 1900s and others since then showed that one of the problems with the all-ceramic anterior crown was that the porcelain would fracture from the fit surface outwards. Some improvements in the strength of porcelain were achieved by the introduction of vacuum firing furnaces, which helps to minimize porosity, and raised the flexural strength of the porcelain from 20–30 MPa to approximately 50–60 MPa. However, this proved not to be adequate to produce reliable ceramic restorations and thus the search was on for a core material that would provide the necessary strength and toughness to prevent fractures arising from cracks propagating from the fit surface of the crown.

Since ceramics tend to fail at the same critical strain of ~0.1%, one means of achieving an increase in fracture strength is to increase the elastic modulus of the material. If, at the same time, the propagation of cracks is made more difficult such that a greater strain can be supported, a higher strength ceramic will result (Figure 3.6.1). The flexural strengths of a number of ceramics are shown in Table 3.6.1. As the tensile strength is a difficult property to measure (giving rise to a wide degree of scatter in the data), it is common practice to determine the flexural strength. Although the silicon nitrides and carbides are attractive from the viewpoint of strength, they are not suitable because of the difficulties associated with the manufacture of individual crowns: the colour differences and the mismatch in the coefficient of thermal expansion.

Table 3.6.1

Typical strength values for high-strength ceramics

Type of ceramic Flexural strength (MPa)
Hot-pressed silicon nitride 800–900
Hot-pressed silicon carbide 400–750
Partially stabilized zirconia 640
Alumina 98% pure 420–520
image
Figure 3.6.1 Improvements in the strength of ceramics by (a) raising the elastic modulus and (b) increasing the resistance to crack propagation

 

Clinical significance

Alumina and zirconia are white and strong, and therefore these ceramics are now used in a number of dental ceramic systems.

In the mid-1960s, McLean and Hughes developed a core material based on the reinforcement of a feldspathic glass with alumina, commonly referred to as the alumina-reinforced porcelain jacket crown (PJC). Since then, other systems have been developed. In the 1980s, the glass-infiltrated, high-strength ceramic cores were developed (In-Ceram, Vita) and, in the 1990s, the all-alumina core made its first appearance (Techceram, Techceram Ltd: Procera AllCeram, Nobel Biocare). Recent work has seen the introduction of ytrria-stabilized zirconia for the fabrication of cores for crown and bridge frameworks.

Alumina-reinforced porcelain jacket crowns

The alumina-reinforced feldspathic core was introduced in the early 1960s by Hughes and McLean. The material consists of a feldspathic glass containing 40–50% alumina (Figure 3.6.2). The alumina particles are far stronger than the glass, and are more effective at preventing crack propagation than quartz, acting as crack stoppers (Figure 3.6.3). Whereas the flexural strength of feldspathic porcelain is, at best, some 60 MPa, this is raised to 120–150 MPa for the aluminous core porcelains.

image
Figure 3.6.2 Scanning electron micrograph of an alumina-reinforced core material showing the alumina particles embedded in a glassy matrix composed of feldspar
image
Figure 3.6.3 Alumina particles acting as crack stoppers

In the construction of a crown, the opaque shade shown in Figure 3.4.3 is made with an aluminous core porcelain. It is still necessary to use the weaker dentine and enamel shades of the feldspathic porcelains because it is not possible to produce aluminous porcelains with the required translucency; the alumina causes the porcelain to appear dull and opaque.

The main application of the alumina-reinforced PJC is for the restoration of anterior teeth. Although the improvement in strength is considerable, it is still insufficient to allow its use posteriorly and the construction of even a three-unit bridge is out of the question.

 

Clinical significance

Yet stronger core materials were needed if the use of ceramics was to be extended to the posterior teeth.

Glass-infiltrated high-strength ceramic core systems

The addition of alumina to the feldspathic glass during the prefritting process limits the amount of alumina/>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Jan 1, 2015 | Posted by in Dental Materials | Comments Off on 3.6: All-ceramic restorations: High-strength core ceramics
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes