Reducing Pockets

Abstract

For patients with more significant periodontal disease, there typically are residual deep pockets remaining after nonsurgical periodontal treatment. While it is possible that repeat scaling and root planing and other nonsurgical methods will further reduce pocketing, for most of these patients, surgical pocket reduction is needed. This chapter will describe why pocketing can persist after quality nonsurgical treatment, and how to prepare a treatment plan and perform these surgeries. The same techniques are also used for crown-lengthening surgery, which is used to prevent complications from restorations impinging on supracrestal attached tissues.

Learning Objectives

  • Recognize indications for pocket-reduction surgery.

  • Develop a surgical treatment plan for reducing periodontal pockets.

  • Describe surgical pocket-reduction techniques.

  • Identify when crown-lengthening procedures are needed.

Case

A 63-year old South Asian male presented to us asking for a “tooth cleaning” since he has not received dental care for about 10 years. He had a history of hypertension, but that abated with diet change and relaxation techniques, and a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is controlled with 5-mg Glucotrol XL (Glipizide) once daily. He reported that he is not required by his physician to measure his glucose at home, but gets it tested regularly through his physician’s office. He also brought in a printout showing the values measured last month: serum glucose 102 mg/dL; HbA1c 6.2%.

Although he had not seen a dentist for many years, he does not have any specific tooth-related complaint other than “feeling the need for a cleaning.” He brushes his teeth twice a day with a hard brush and flosses twice a day. When asked about the tooth wear and suspected parafunctional habit, he replied that his previous dentist thought he grinds his teeth at night.

Extraoral exam findings revealed no abnormal findings for the facial skin, lymph nodes, thyroid gland, cranial nerves, salivary glands, masticatory muscles, and temporomandibular joint other than reduced hearing on the left side. Intraorally, no mucosal pathology was apparent other than periodontal disease and a small, 2-mm diameter white round nodule at the height of the occlusal plane on the left lateral border of the tongue. Teeth had worn occlusal surfaces and small abfraction lesions, but were otherwise in good repair.

Blood pressure was 124/83 mm Hg and pulse 70/min.

Initial findings in the periodontal chart were as follows (see Fig. 6.1 for clinical presentation and Fig. 6.2 for radiographs).

Maxilla facial

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

PD

325

434

323

323

313

323

322

223

323

323

983

BOP

1

1

11

CAL

5

7

5

5

5

5

8

4

4

4

10

GR

333

121

232

122

233

554

211

101

101

112

MGJ

554

334

434

354

555

555

444

444

444

533

222

Furc

1

PLQ

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Maxilla lingual

PD

449

446

424

624

433

333

333

223

323

324

635

BOP

11

1

1

1

111

CAL

9

8

4

6

4

5

8

4

5

5

9

GR

342

12

21

112

354

22

22

21

264

Furc

2

2 1

Mobil

3

1

3

PLQ

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Mandible lingual

32

31

30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

PD

746

437

435

323

322

222

222

222

222

223

322

323

424

667

663

BOP

1

1

CAL

7

7

5

3

3

3

5

5

5

5

3

4

4

8

8

GR

11

1

123

233

232

232

1

121

122

MGJ

1

667

656

655

444

333

333

433

344

433

444

555

656

666

667

Furc

1

1

PLQ

2

3

3

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Mandible facial

PD

524

426

425

323

323

323

342

322

223

332

233

323

323

626

657

BOP

1

1

11

CAL

5

7

6

4

3

3

5

5

5

6

3

4

3

6

7

GR

241

121

11

1

1

11

222

222

232

1

2

1

21

MGJ

334

324

324

444

434

435

444

444

444

444

444

433

545

545

444

Furc

1

1

Mobil

1

1

1

1

PLQ

2

1

111

Abbreviations: BOP, bleeding on probing (1), suppuration (2); CAL, clinical attachment level; Furc, furcation involvement (Glickman class); GR, gingival recession; MGJ, position of mucogingival junction from margin; Mobil, tooth mobility (Miller grade); PD, probing depths; PLQ, plaque level (0 = none, 5 = heavy).

No Image Available!

Fig. 6.1 (a, b) Initial presentation of lower right quadrant representative of all mandibular teeth.

No Image Available!

Fig. 6.2 Radiographs taken as part of initial exam.

Teeth nos. 1, 3, and 14 were considered hopeless and removed soon after the initial exam. The patient received scaling and root planing (SRP) in all quadrants and was instructed to use a gentle brushing technique using a soft brush. In addition, the patient was instructed on how to use interproximal brushes. This resulted in some pocket reduction, but there were still residual deep pockets between mandibular molars.

Pocket depths after SRP are as follows:

Facial

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

PD

223

323

323

323

322

223

322

333

BOP

1

1

Lingual

PD

223

523

322

322

322

222

323

322

BOP

1

Lingual

32

31

30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

PD

733

435

325

323

222

332

222

222

212

122

213

324

323

647

532

BOP

Facial

PD

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

BOP

423

426

324

323

322

323

342

222

223

422

223

323

314

627

542

Partial osseous resective surgery, with bone grafting of the deeper bone defects, was performed for the mandibular quadrants, and the patient seen every 3 to 4 months for periodontal maintenance. This surgical treatment reduced pocketing to low levels, and they were maintained at that level 2 years after the surgery by periodic periodontal maintenance.

Pocket depths 2 years after surgery are as follows:

Facial

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

PD

223

323

323

323

323

223

323

323

BOP

1

Lingual

PD

323

323

332

323

323

334

433

423

BOP

111

111

111

1 1

Lingual

32

31

30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

PD

545

434

424

323

323

322

222

222

422

232

323

323

333

434

444

BOP

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

Facial

PD

1

1

1

1

1

111

BOP

324

334

424

423

323

323

323

323

323

323

323

323

323

423

433

What can be learned from this case?

This case illustrates that successful pocket reduction may require both nonsurgical and surgical treatments. The case benefited from a patient who is reasonably healthy and is committed to improving his health as shown by his effective, although abrasive oral hygiene technique, apparent compliance with medical treatment, and his apparent ability to reduce his blood pressure with lifestyle changes. Unlike Chapter 5 case, this patient has more bony irregularities and these likely explain the need for surgery in this case. The bony defects probably harbor deep subgingival plaque and calculus accretions on the root surfaces adjacent to these defects, and the shape of the bone defect with surrounding tissue made it impossible to remove all deposits. When these were exposed and removed surgically, this allowed proper healing and reduced pocket depths. Patients with low probing depths can be predictably maintained, and this is the reason for the observed periodontal stability.

Recognize Indications for Pocket-reduction Surgery

Generally, the indications for pocket-reduction surgery are residual deep pockets after high-quality nonsurgical periodontal treatment in a compliant patient.

Risks Associated with Residual Deep Pocketing

Residual deep pocketing poses the following risks:

  • Increased risk of further attachment loss and eventual tooth loss.

  • Continues active disease and possible systemic risks of periodontal disease.

  • Deep pocketing and gingival bleeding may cause inaccurate impressions, resulting in poor restorations and premature treatment failure.

  • Increased risk of periodontal abscesses and associated pain.

  • Increased risk of peri-implant disease.

  • Less predictable orthodontic tooth movement and risk of tooth loss during therapy.

  • Longer and more difficult periodontal maintenance, which also may not be effective.

Consequently, deep pocketing needs to be eliminated prior to orthodontics and complex restorative procedures such as implant therapy, crown fabrication, and fixed and removable partial denture therapy.

Causes of Residual Deep Pocketing

Residual deep pocketing is usually caused by residual subgingival plaque or calculus left after nonsurgical therapy. Besides operator error or lack of experience, the following factors may prevent complete calculus removal:

  • Deep pockets: In pockets deeper than 5 mm, complete calculus removal is unlikely.

  • Pocket anatomy: Some pockets have curved anatomy, and pocket gingiva prevents visualization of calculus and instrumentation access.

  • Bone defects: Narrow entrances to bone defects covered with pocket tissue prevent access.

  • Furcation entrances: For molars, this is the typical cause of residual pockets.

  • Root surface abnormalities such as developmental grooves, enamel projections, ridges, root concavities, and enamel pearls are associated with residual pockets. Failing to remove these abnormalities is a common reason for residual pockets after periodontal surgery. Common sites are as follows:

    • Mid-lingual at palatogingival grooves at maxillary lateral incisors.

    • Deep mesial root concavities on maxillary 1st premolars.

    • Cervical enamel projections at furcation entrances.

    • Enamel pearls near furcation entrances of 2nd and 3rd maxillary molars.

Residual pocketing may also be caused by persistent inflammation caused by caries, defective restorations, biologic width invasion, occlusal trauma, and endodontic infections.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free dental videos. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 4, 2021 | Posted by in Periodontics | Comments Off on Reducing Pockets

VIDEdental - Online dental courses

Get VIDEdental app for watching clinical videos