16.6
End of Life
Section I: Clinical Scenario and Dental Considerations
Clinical Scenario
You are contacted by the palliative care physician responsible for the care of an 80‐year‐old woman who is currently residing in a hospice. The physician is concerned that the patient has a mobile lower incisor which poses an aspiration risk and asks that you undertake an urgent domiciliary visit.
Medical History
- Severe multi‐infarct (vascular) dementia – fluctuating consciousness between stupor and hypersomnia; unable to mobilise
- Aspiration pneumonia, hospitalised following 2 episodes over the past 3 months
- Thromboembolic stroke, right middle cerebral artery stroke 3 years ago
- Ischaemic heart disease
- Severe dysphagia – nasogastric tube in place for 2 years; nil‐by‐mouth
- Double incontinence
- History of laryngeal carcinoma 25 years ago treated with conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 33 fractions)
- Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) positive
- Hypertension (target organ damage)
Medications
- Clopidogrel
- Timolol maleate (eye drops)
- Vitamin B, vitamin D and calcium supplements
- Omeprazole
Dental History
- Has not received oral hygiene assistance at the long‐term care facility over the past year
- Last visit to a dentist over 5 years ago
Social History
- Husband is the main care‐giver and next of kin
- Patient resident in a hospice and confined to the bed
- Hospital transport with capacity to allow for a trolley bed required for essential hospital visits
Oral Examination
- Limited co‐operation for examination
- Mouth breathing/xerostomia (Figure 16.6.1)
- Persistent bruxism and clenching
- #14: grade III mobility
- Coating on tooth surfaces and palate
Radiological Examination
- Not possible
Structured Learning
- What could be causing the coating on the palate?
- The coating consists of a dehydrated mix of secretions from minor salivary glands in the palate and exfoliated epidermal or mucosal tissues
- These can coat the oral mucosal surfaces and the occlusal surfaces of teeth
- Contributing factors include:
- Xerostomia (mouth breathing)
- Poor hydration
- Reduced oral cleansing due to reduced oromuscular function
- Lack of oral care provision in the hospice
- What is the significant risk associated with the palatal debris?
- Microbial colonisation can occur
- The debris can dislodge and obstruct the airway
- Despite placement of the nasogastric tube to aid feeding, the patient remains at risk of aspiration of fragments of the debris, increasing the likelihood of aspiration pneumonia
- What factors would have contributed to the inability to obtain radiographs?
- Avaliability of a portable X‐ray device
- Limited co‐operation (dementia)
- Limited access (stroke)
- Bruxism/clenching
- Possibility of displacing #14
- What other factors do you need to consider in your risk assessment when planning to extract #14?
- Social
- Non‐ambulatory
- Fully dependent
- Medical
- Multiple comorbidities, ASA IV (severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life)
- Dementia resulting in limited co‐operation and capacity
- Significant dysphagia/aspiration risk; related pneumonia risk
- Dental treatment may elevate blood pressure and precipitate an episode of angina due to stress and anxiety (see Chapter 8.2)
- Increased bleeding risk due to antiplatelet therapy and hypertension (not clinically significant; see Chapter 10.5)
- MRSA positive
- Double incontinence (require facilities to change pads as required)
- Dental
- Risk of aspiration of the mobile tooth
- Neglected oral health/poor oral hygiene
- Chronic complications of radiotherapy, including osteoradionecrosis of the bone
- Inability to open mouth
- Limited co‐operation
- The decision is made to extract the hypermobile #14 urgently at the hospice with sedation provided via the nasogastric tube and close monitoring by the palliative care physician. Why is this particularly appropriate given the patient’s MRSA status?
- Arranging to see the patient in her hospice room avoids transport, thereby minimising further environmental contamination/exposure of additional persons to MRSA
- What additional precautions would you take given that the patient is MRSA positive?
- Standard recommendations for disease control and prevention are generally adequate for preventing the transmission of MRSA and include:
- Minimise the number of dental staff attending to essential members only
- Use of personal protective equipment is essential and should be donned before entering the patient’s room
- Strict hand hygiene protocols should be in place
- Appropriate handling of contaminated equipment, materials and surfaces is essential
- Safe handling of sharps and safe injection practices should be observed
- Three weeks later, you are contacted by the hospice again as the patient has developed a painful swelling on the side of her face. The concern is that this may be due to a dental abscess. What would be your approach?
- Confirm that the patient has received pain control and antibiotics have been prescribed given the likelihood of infection
- Confirm if the patient is still MRSA positive
- Discuss whether further sedation can be administered by the physician to allow improved access to the mouth to visualise the teeth/deliver urgent dental treatment
- Domiciliary care:
- Portable handheld/wireless x‐ray radiation devices can be useful to obtain intraoral radiographs
- Undertake required dental treatment if this can be provided safely in the hospice setting (e.g. simple dental extraction of a mobile tooth where the tooth can be fully visualised/the airway protected)
- Domiciliary care: