The authors regret an error regarding the unit of measurement reported in Table III and Figure 3 of the original publication. In the original article, the unit for Total Ramal Height (TRH) was incorrectly labeled as “mm” (millimeters), while the numerical values presented were actually in pixels.

To ensure clinical relevance and accuracy, the authors have converted the pixel measurements to millimeters. The calculation is based on the pixel spacing of the images, which is 0.0818 mm/pixel (this value was rounded to 0.08 mm/pixel in the original article). Accounting for the subsequent image resizing from a width of 1244 pixels to 800 pixels (scaling factor: 800÷1244≈0.643), the final conversion factor is 1 pixel ≈ 0.127 mm (0.0818÷0.643).

Revised versions of Table III and Figure 3 are provided below using the corrected millimeter values. The P values, ICCs, and study findings remain unchanged.

Revised Table III

Descriptive statistics and ICCs between AI and manual measurements (Values converted to mm: 1 pixel ≈ 0.127 mm)

Measurement	AI		Manual		P value	ICC
	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
Angle (°)
GA (Right)	122.66	7.04	122.52	6.99	0.803	0.991 ∗
GA (Left)	123.47	6.66	123.49	6.65	0.979	0.985 ∗
Length (mm)
TRH1 (Right)	46.82	7.23	46.82	7.05	0.995	0.984 ∗
TRH1 (Left)	46.27	7.08	46.88	6.83	0.372	0.984 ∗
TRH2 (Right)	51.38	7.80	51.89	7.65	0.555	0.984 ∗
TRH2 (Left)	51.06	7.53	51.43	7.44	0.648	0.987 ∗
TRH3 (Right)	46.74	7.25	46.77	7.05	0.954	0.983 ∗
TRH3 (Left)	46.19	7.09	46.80	6.84	0.378	0.984 ∗

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related posts:

1. The orthodontist’s role in sleep-disordered breathing: From screening to collaborative care □Subscribe to RSS feed□Subscribe to RSS feed
2. Comment on: “Anatomic assessment of palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices insertion sites among patients with cleidocranial dysplasia vs controls: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography analysis” Subscribe to RSS feedSubscribe to RSS feed
3. Authors’ response □Subscribe to RSS feed□Subscribe to RSS feed
4. Corrigendum to Hussain U and Pandis N. Visualizing the effect sizes if the meta-analyses through contour-enhanced forest plots. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2025;168:776-81 Subscribe to RSS feedSubscribe to RSS feed
5. Staying the course Subscribe to RSS feedSubscribe to RSS feed
6. Sleep-disordered breathing and orthodontics: An American Association of Orthodontists white paper update □Subscribe to RSS feed□Subscribe to RSS feed

Stay updated, free dental videos. Join our Telegram channel

Join