Class II division 2 malocclusion: Types and management strategies

Introduction

Class II division 2 malocclusion is a distinct category of class II malocclusion with unique features of retroclined incisors and a strong familial inheritance pattern. The subjects with class II division 2 malocclusion have round/square faces, craniofacial features of horizontal growth and distinct dental features, which are unique and differentiate them from all other types of malocclusions to the extent of being categorised as a syndrome.

‘Division 2 (of class II) is characterised specifically also by distal occlusion of the teeth in both lateral halves of the lower dental arch, indicated by the mesiodistal relations of the first permanent molars, associated with retrusion instead of protrusion of the upper incisors’, wrote E.H. Angle in 1907. The deep bite is due to the infra-occlusion of the molars. ‘The molars have failed to erupt to their normal length, allowing the lower incisors to come in contact with the vault of the maxillary arch, while the cutting edges of the upper incisors pass beyond the gingival margins of the lowers’.

There is a wide range of severity of class II division 2 malocclusions, some exhibiting minimal classification characteristics, with only dental manifestations of this malocclusion.

Features of class II division 2 malocclusion

Facial features

Facial features of class II division 2 malocclusion include a square/round pleasing face, prominent chin, deep labio-mental sulcus, hyperactive lower lip, a high lower lip line, thin upper lip, small gonial angle and horizontal type of face. The masseter and temporalis muscles are broad, and these subjects have a strong biting force. The lips are usually thin, and there is a lack of vertical development of the face below the nose ( Fig. 68.1 ).

Figure 68.1

Profile of a patient with class II division 2 malocclusion.

A square or a round face, backwardly held mandible with a thick chin button and thin lips.

Dental features

Dental features include a class II molar and canine relationship, deep traumatic bite, retroclined upper four incisors or retroclined central incisors with a labial inclination of the laterals and supra-erupted upright lower incisors. The tooth size may be small, and the upper incisors may have an increased collum angle between the crown and the root ( Fig. 68.2 ). The incisors are relatively thin with small tubercles. Class II division 2 incisors have a shorter root, a longer crown, axial bending of the incisor and reduced labio-palatal thickness.

Figure 68.2

Occlusion of class II division 2 malocclusion.

(A) There is a deep traumatic bite, retroclined maxillary central incisors, proclined laterals and crowding in the mandibular arch. (B) The collum angle can be measured as an angle between the long axis of the crown and the long axis of the root. It may exhibit an increased collum angle when measured as an external angle.

The maxillary incisors in class II division 2 malocclusion are about 12 degrees more vertical than those in normal occlusion. The mandibular incisors are upright in a class II division 2 malocclusion but to a lesser extent than the upper incisors. Not only are the upper and lower incisors more recumbent, but they are also more retrusive. The maxillary arch is often wide in the posterior region and crowded in the anterior region. However, there is a transverse underdevelopment of the mandible from canine to canine, which is probably a factor responsible for mandibular incisor compression and crowding. Consequently, these malocclusions are associated with severe deep bites ( Fig. 68.2 ).

Class II division 2 subtypes

  • 1.

    Based on freeway space

    • There are two subtypes of class II division 2 malocclusions:

      • a.

        Such as the type in which the patient has excessive freeway space with a lack of posterior alveolar development and anterior alveolar overgrowth and

      • b.

        That in which the patient has normal freeway space.

  • 2.

    Based on dental features:

    • van der Linden described three types of class II division 2 patterns based on the alignment of incisors and canines.

      • Type A: All four maxillary incisors are palatally tipped, and the maxillary canines are well aligned ( Fig. 68.3 ).

        Figure 68.3

        Class II division 2 type A.

        The four permanent maxillary incisors are tipped palatally, while the maxillary canines are well aligned in the dental arch.

      • Type B: The maxillary central incisors are palatally tipped, and the lateral incisors are labially tipped ( Fig. 68.4 ).

        Figure 68.4

        Class II division 2 type B.

        The maxillary central incisors are palatally tipped, and the lateral incisors are labially tipped.

      • Type C: All four maxillary incisors are palatally tipped, and the canines are buccally placed ( Fig. 68.5 ).

        Figure 68.5

        Class II division 2 type C.

        The four maxillary incisors are tipped palatally, and the canines are placed buccally.

Cephalometric features

The anterior cranial base lengths and sagittal position of the maxilla are normal relative to class I and class II division 1 malocclusions. In contrast, class II division 2 malocclusions have a shorter or normal mandibular length with its sagittal position retruded, the chin is prominent and the lower posterior facial height is increased.

The mandibular growth vector is horizontally oriented, with a flat mandibular plane, giving the appearance of a hypo-divergent facial pattern. The gonial angle is acute. The lower incisors have a normal inclination relative to the mandibular plane but are retroclined relative to the facial plane. The inter-incisal angle is large, and the overbite is deep due to infra occlusion of the molars. There is an extreme skeletal mandibular counterclockwise rotation rather than dentoalveolar supra eruption.

Aetiology

The class II division 2 pattern is known to have a strong familial occurrence. Peck and Peck called it a heritable entity of small teeth in well-developed jaws. According to their findings, the pattern of strong vertical posterior development of the mandible with upward and forward rotation and skeletal-facial hypo-divergence anteroposteriorly, smaller mesiodistal tooth diameters for the maxillary and mandibular incisors are characteristic patterns of heritable skeletal and tooth-size features in class II division 2 malocclusion. These findings indicate the presence of strong genetic influences in the formation of Angle’s class II division 2 overbite discrepancies.

Ruf and Pancherz have reported a pair of monozygotic twins showing malocclusion discordance with a class II division 1 malocclusion in one and division 2 in another child. Based on this report, they have hypothesised that heredity is not the sole aetiological factor of class II division 2 malocclusion, as normally one would expect similar occlusion in monozygotic twins. Increased lip tension, higher lip position and pressure exerted by the lower lip to upper incisors lead to retroclination.

Treatment considerations

The deep overbite should be corrected first in a patient with a hypo-divergent facial pattern, redundant lips and a flat mandibular plane angle. Further, facial aesthetics can be improved by increasing the lower facial height, correcting lip redundancy or increasing facial convexity. Teeth in the lower buccal segment are encouraged to supra erupt in growing patients, increasing the lower anterior facial height and allowing favourable mandibular growth. The stability is good in the growing subjects. However, molar extrusion is not recommended for adult patients because the stability is highly questionable.

A strong muscular pattern may not permit the bite opening with the vertical increase of the buccal segment in adult patients. The shape features of maxillary central incisors with increased collum angle could precipitate the development of a deep overbite in class II division 2 malocclusions.

They may limit the amount of palatal root torque during fixed appliance therapy. The narrow mandibular arch in the anterior region limits the relief of crowding, and the retention plan should include a long-term fixed, rigid lingual retainer.

May 10, 2026 | Posted by in Orthodontics | 0 comments

Leave a Reply

VIDEdental - Online dental courses

Get VIDEdental app for watching clinical videos