Author’s reply

We thank Dr Celikoglu for his interest in our article and for the comments and matters he raised.

We mentioned that a late developing dentition with an insufficiently developed lateral incisor might affect the migration of the developing canine and result in its impaction. Such an effect was attributed to the guidance theory of the lateral incisor. The root of a late developing lateral incisor will be too rudimentary to provide the critical guidance for the developing canine at the early stages; thus, the canine develops more mesially and palatally in the ensuing early stages of palatal displacement.

Dr Celikoglu criticized the inclusion of subjects with missing teeth in our sample, since hypodontia has been linked to delayed tooth development. Until now, research in this area has been minimal, and there is no consensus in the literature regarding this matter; some studies have confirmed the link, whereas others disagreed.

Regarding the relationship between dental development and sagittal and vertical skeletal jaw relationships, a few studies were conducted in this area. The study investigating sagittal discrepancies and dental development was published after our study had been carried out. Secondly, in studies conducted in our department comparing dental and skeletal ages in different skeletal sagittal and vertical jaw relationships, no difference was found regarding dental age in any studied group. The difference in results between the studies of Celikoglu et al and Kanaan et al could be attributed to the sample size and characteristics (age, male-to-female ratio, ethnic background, and so on).

Once more, we highly appreciate Dr Celikoglu’s valuable comments; they certainly guide and present areas for further research linking various types of malocclusions and canine impactions with dental development.


  1. 1. Zilberman Y., Cohen B., and Becker A.: Familial trends in palatal canines, anomalous lateral incisors, and related phenomena. Eur J Orthod 1990; 12: pp. 135-139
  2. 2. Becker A.: Etiology of maxillary canine impactions. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: pp. 437-438
  3. 3. Rune B., and Sarnäs K.V.: Tooth size and tooth formation in children with advanced hypodontia. Angle Orthod 1974; 44: pp. 316-321
  4. 4. Uslenghi S., Liversidge H.M., and Wong F.S.: A radiographic study of tooth development in hypodontia. Arch Oral Biol 2006; 51: pp. 129-133
  5. 5. Kan W., Seow W., and Holcombe T.: A case-control study of dental development in hypodontic and hyperdontic children. Pediatr Dent 2010; 32: pp. 127-133
  6. 6. Tunc E., Bayrak S., and Koyuturk A.: Dental development in children with mild-to-moderate hypodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: pp. 334-338
  7. 7. Odagami Y., Kida A., Inoue M., and Kurosu K.: Dental age of children with congenitally missing permanent teeth. Jpn J Pedodontics 1995; 33: pp. 91-98
  8. 8. Lozada P.A., and Infante C.: Estudio de la maduraci on dental y edad dental en individuos con ausencia cong_enita de dientes permanentes comparados con individuos sin ausencia cong_enita dental. Int J Dent Anthropol 2001; 2: pp. 24-29
  9. 9. Celikoglu M., Erdem A., Dane A., and Demirci T.: Dental age assessment in orthodontic patients with and without skeletal malocclusions. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: pp. 58-62
  10. 10. Kanaan R.: The relationship between chronological, skeletal and dental ages according to anteroposterior jaw relationship [thesis]. Irbid, Jordan: Jordan University of Science and Technology, 2009.
  11. 11. Kanaan R., Al-Khateeb S., Gh Aljamal, and Abu Alhaija E.: Dental and skeletal ages in different skeletal jaw relationships. Eur J Pediatr Dent 2012; undefined:
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Apr 8, 2017 | Posted by in Orthodontics | Comments Off on Author’s reply
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes