8: Impression Materials

Impression Materials

Key Terms

Construction of a model or cast is an important step in numerous dental procedures. Various types of casts and models can be made from gypsum products using an impression mold or negative likeness of a dental structure (Figure 8-1). The dentist designs and constructs both removable and fixed prostheses on a gypsum cast. Thus, the cast must be an accurate representation of oral structures, which requires an accurate impression.

To produce accurate replicas of intra- and extraoral tissues, the impression materials should be (1) sufficiently fluid to adapt to the oral tissues, (2) viscous enough to be contained in a tray, (3) able to transform (set) into a rubbery or rigid solid in the mouth in a reasonable time (less than 7 min), (4) resistant to distortion or tearing when removed from the mouth, (5) dimensionally stable long enough to allow one or more casts to be poured, (6) biocompatible, and (7) cost-effective in terms of time as well as the expense of the associated processing equipment.

Environmental conditions and the type of tissue dictate the choice of materials, quality of the impression, and quality of the cast. This chapter discusses the unique properties of currently used impression materials and describes how these characteristics affect the quality of an impression and of the cast or model made from the impression.

Classification of Impression Materials

Impression materials that are used today can be classified according to their composition, mechanism of setting, mechanical properties, and applications. Table 8-1 shows the classification based on the setting mechanism and mechanical characteristics. The composition of the materials is discussed later.


Classification of Dental Impression Materials

Setting Mechanism Inelastic Elastic
Chemical reaction (irreversible) Plaster of Paris
Zinc oxide–eugenol
Condensation silicone
Addition silicone
Thermally induced physical reaction (reversible) Impression compound Agar


Elastomeric Impression Materials

Elastomers comprise a group of synthetic polymer-based impression materials that are chemically cross-linked when set and that can be stretched and yet rapidly recover to their original dimensions, like vulcanized natural rubber when the applied stress is released. Chemically, there are three elastomers based on the backbone of polymer chains: polysulfide, silicone (condensation and addition), and polyether. Representative products are shown in Figure 8-2. In this chapter, they are called elastomeric impression materials.

They are supplied in two components, a base paste and a catalyst paste (or liquid) that are mixed before making impressions. They are often formulated in several consistencies, including extra low, low, medium, heavy, and putty, in increasing order of filler content. Extra-low and putty forms are available only for condensation and addition silicones. Polysulfide is provided only in light-body and heavy-body consistencies. There is no heavy-body product for condensation silicone. Pigments are added to give each material a distinct color.

Hydrocolloids, which are discussed in later sections, are elastic impression materials but they are not categorized as elastomers.


The base paste, is a polysulfide polymer that contains a multifunctional mercaptan (-SH) called a polysulfide polymer, a suitable filler (such as lithopone or titanium dioxide) to provide the required strength, a plasticizer (such as dibutyl phthalate) to confer the appropriate viscosity to the paste, and a small quantity of sulfur, approximately 0.5%, as an accelerator. The catalyst (or accelerator) paste contains lead dioxide, filler, and plasticizer as in the base paste, and oleic or stearic acid as a retarder to control the rate of the setting reaction. Lead dioxide is the component that gives polysulfide impression material its characteristic brown color. The terms catalyst and accelerator used here and with other impression materials are actually misnomers. Reactor is a more appropriate term for the reactions associated with polysulfide and other types of impression materials.

Each paste is supplied in a dispensing tube with appropriately sized bore diameters at the tip so that equal lengths of each paste are extruded from each tube to provide the correct ratio of polymer to cross-linking agent. Since the composition of the material in the tube is balanced with that of the accelerator, the matched tubes supplied by the manufacturer should always be used.

The reaction starts at the beginning of mixing and reaches its maximum rate soon after spatulation is complete (Figure 8-3). At this stage, a resilient network has started to form. During the final set, a material of adequate elasticity and strength is formed that can be removed past undercuts quite readily. Moisture and temperature have a significant effect on the course of the reaction. In particular, hot and humid conditions will accelerate the setting of polysulfide impression material. The reaction yields water as a by-product. Loss of this small molecule from the set material has a significant effect on the dimensional stability of the impression.

Condensation Silicone

The materials are supplied as a base paste and a low-viscosity liquid catalyst (or paste catalyst), a two-paste system, or a two-putty system. The putty can be used as the tray material in conjunction with a low-viscosity silicone, that is referred to as the putty-wash technique.

The base paste consists of α-ω-hydroxyl-terminated polydimethyl siloxane (Figure 8-4). The curing of this material involves a reaction of tri- and tetra-functional alkyl silicates in the presence of stannous octoate as a catalyst. The material sets by cross-linking between terminal groups of the silicone polymers and the alkyl silicate to form a three-dimensional network (Figure 8-4). Ethyl alcohol is a by-product of the condensation setting reaction. Its subsequent evaporation accounts for much of the contraction that takes place in the setting impression.

Addition Silicone

This material is often called a polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) or vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression material. In contrast to the condensation silicone, the addition silicone is based on addition polymerization between divinylpolysiloxane and polymethylhydrosiloxane with a platinum salt as the catalyst (Figure 8-5). The base paste contains polymethylhydrosiloxane, as well as divinylpolysiloxane. The catalyst (or accelerator) paste contains divinylpolysiloxane and a platinum salt. The platinum salt and polymethylhydrosiloxane are separated before mixing. Both pastes contain fillers.

No reaction by-products are formed as long as the correct proportions of divinylpolysiloxane and polymethylhydrosiloxane are used and there are no impurities. However, the residual polymethylhydrosiloxane in the material can lead to a secondary reaction with each other or with moisture, to produce hydrogen gas. Technically, hydrogen gas is a reaction by-product that does not affect the dimensional stability of the impression. Nonetheless, the hydrogen gas evolved can result in pinpoint voids in the gypsum casts poured soon after removal of the impression from the mouth. Manufacturers may add a noble metal, such as palladium, as a scavenger for the released hydrogen gas. The impression should be left overnight if epoxy will be used for pouring models.

One of the disadvantages of the silicone impression materials (including condensation silicones) is their inherent hydrophobic nature. A nonionic surfactant can be added to the paste in the manufacturing process to render a degree of hydrophilicity to the surface of the material. This surfactant migrates toward the surface of the impression material and has its hydrophilic segment oriented toward the surface—a phenomenon that makes the surface more wettable by water. These impression materials still require a dry field for impression making. Pouring the set impression with a gypsum-forming mixture is facilitated because the wet stone has a greater affinity for the hydrophilic surface. The clinical significance of hydrophilic additives is discussed in subsequent sections.

Sulfur contamination from natural latex gloves inhibits the setting of addition silicone. Some vinyl gloves may have the same effect because of the sulfur-containing stabilizer used in the manufacturing process. The contamination is so pervasive that touching the tooth with latex gloves before seating the impression can inhibit the setting of the critical surface next to the tooth.

Medium-body addition silicone has also been formulated for making impressions for diagnostic purposes, as a substitute for alginate impression material (discussed later). The advantage of these so-called alginate substitutes is the ability to make multiple, accurate diagnostic casts from one impression. Laboratory studies have reported that they exhibited better detail reproduction and less variability in linear dimensional change than irreversible hydrocolloid.


There are two types of polyether impression materials. The first is based on the ring-opening polymerization of aziridine rings, which are at the end of branched polyether molecules (Figure 8-6, left). The main chain is probably a copolymer of ethylene oxide and tetrahydrofuran. Cross-linking and setting are promoted by an initiator and an aromatic sulfonate ester (Figure 8-6, top), where R is an alkyl group. This produces cross-linking by cationic polymerization via the imine end groups (Figure 8-6). The material is supplied as two pastes. The base paste contains the polyether polymer, colloidal silica as filler, and a plasticizer such as glycol ether or phthalate. The accelerator paste contains an alkyl-aromatic sulfonate in addition to the filler and plasticizer. The ether-dominated polymer backbones make this group of materials the most hydrophilic of all elastomeric impression materials.

The second type is based on an acid-catalyzed condensation polymerization of polyether prepolymer with alkoxysilane terminal groups. The mechanism is similar to that observed in condensation silicones having low-molecular-weight alcohols as by-products. This material is often called a hybrid. Since the ether-linkages constitute the main component of the polymer chains, these materials behave very much like the first type of polyether impression material.

Making Impresssions with Elastomeric Materials

The use of elastomeric impression material to fabricate gypsum models, casts, and dies involves six major steps: (1) preparing a tray, (2) managing tissue, (3) preparing the material, (4) making an impression, (5) removing the impression, and (6) preparing stone casts and dies.

Impression Trays

The use of a custom tray (Figure 8-7, A) is recommended to reduce the quantity of material required to make impressions; thus, any dimensional changes attributed to the materials are minimized. A custom tray allows a uniform distribution of impression material between the tray and the object, which also improves accuracy. This is especially true for polysulfide impression material. The use of custom trays for polyether and addition silicone impressions is not critical, since these materials are stiffer and have less polymerization shrinkage than the polysulfide material. In addition, disposable stock trays (Figure 8-7, B) work satisfactorily. Note that the use of less material in a custom tray reduces the compressibility of the impression, which can make removal of the impression tray more difficult. When severe undercuts are present, the use of a custom tray should be avoided. The stock tray should be rigid, thereby minimizing flexure of the tray during impression making. Disposable stock trays are also used to support the putty when the putty-wash technique is used for making impressions. Prior to making an impression, a uniform thickness of tray adhesive is applied on the tray surface, extending over its edge, and it is allowed to dry (through evaporation of solvent). A slightly roughened surface on the tray will increase adhesion. Tray adhesives are not interchangeable among different types of materials.

When the material is used correctly, either custom or stock trays yield clinically acceptable impressions.

Tissue Management

The margins of tooth preparations for fixed prostheses often extend to or below the free margin of the gingiva. To ensure access for the tooth preparation and for making the impression, it is necessary to displace the gingival tissues, control gingival hemorrhage, and control sulcular fluids. Among the most popular methods of gingival displacement is the use of gingival retraction cord. An electrosurgical unit or a soft tissue laser can also be used.

The objective of placing a retraction cord is to displace the gingival tissue laterally away from the margin of the preparation. One or two gingival retraction cords are placed under the margin around the tooth for at least 5 min before making impressions. The double-cord technique is used when the margin is very close to the gingival attachment. A fine cord is placed at the base of the crevice to facilitate moisture control, with a larger cord placed on top of the first and near the coronal extent to displace the gingiva laterally. The latter, outermost cord is removed, leaving the fine cord within the crevice while the impression is made. A single cord is sufficient to deflect the soft tissue around the margin when the preparation margin is at or slightly above the gingival crest.

Retraction cords may be impregnated with a hemostatic agent by dipping the cord in a hemostatic solution prior to placement. These agents can have unintended side effects and should be used with caution. For example, epinephrine, which is used widely, is of particular concern in patients with cardiovascular disease. In addition, agents with a low pH can remove the smear layer and superficial dentin apical to the margins of the preparation, possibly leading to postoperative sensitivity of some teeth.

Manipulation of Impression Materials

Currently, elastomeric impression materials are supplied for three modes of mixing: hand mixing, static mixing, and dynamic mechanical mixing (Figure 8-8).

Hand Mixing

The user should dispense the same lengths of materials onto a mixing pad or glass slab (Figure 8-8, A). The catalyst paste is first collected on a stainless steel spatula and then spread over the base paste. The mixture is then spread over the mixing pad. The mass is then scraped up with the spatula blade and spread uniformly back and forth on the mixing pad. This process is continued until the mixed paste is uniform in color, with no streaks of the base or catalyst appearing in the mixture. If one of the components is in liquid form, such as the catalyst for condensation silicones, a length of the base is dispensed from the tube onto a graduated mixing pad and drops of the liquid catalyst corresponding to the length of the base are added. These materials are somewhat difficult to mix because of the difference in the viscosity of the two components.

The two-putty systems available for condensation and addition silicone are dispensed by volume using an equal number of scoops of each material. The best mixing technique is to knead the material with one’s fingers until a uniform color is obtained. When the catalyst is a liquid, as in the case of condensation silicones, this kneading procedure with the fingers is applicable.

Static Mixing

This technique transforms two fluid (or paste-like) materials into a homogeneous mixture without mechanical mixing. The device used to accomplish this mixing is a gun for compressing materials in a two-cylinder cartridge, which contains the base and catalyst separately, as well as a mixing tip (Figure 8-8, B). The mixing tip is made of helical mixer elements in a cylindrical housing (Figure 8-9). The mixer elements are a series of alternating right- and left-turn 180° helixes positioned so that the leading edge of one element is perpendicular to the trailing edge of the next (Figure 8-9, B). The length of each element is about the same as the inner diameter of the cylindrical housing.

The base and catalyst are pressed from the cartridge into the mixing tip as one stream of a two-layer material. The leading edge of the first element splits the material entering the mixer into two streams. The streams that flow in either side of the helix will make a 180° turn (Figure 8-9, A) when they reach the second element. Both streams are split by the leading edge of the second element, and two substreams (one from each original stream) combine into two new streams entering the second element. This process is known as flow division. Assuming that there is no intermixing between the two substreams as they merge, the new stream will have a two-layer structure. After flowing through “n” elements, the number of layers in the stream of material increases to 2n. The most common mixing tips for impression material mixing have 11 or 12 elements. The stream of material that exits the mixing tip will have a 2048- or 4096-striation structure, which can be treated as a uniformly mixed stream of material. In addition, as the materials make turns along the helix, the rotational circulation causes a radial mixing of the materials. Thus, mixing between substreams occurs before the next flow division that further increases the uniformity of the mixture. Since there is no mechanical mixing, porosity caused by mixing with air is avoided. The mixing tips vary in their diameter, length (number of helical mixer elements), and the size of openings for a specific consistency.

The mixed impression material is injected directly into the adhesive-coated tray or, if the “syringe tip” is in place, onto the prepared teeth. Static mixing provides greater uniformity in proportioning and mixing, yields fewer voids in the mix, and reduces the mixing time. In addition, there are fewer possibilities for contamination of the material. One precaution that should be taken in using these automixing devices is to make sure that the openings of the tubes that dispense the pastes remain unclogged. Problems can be avoided if one expresses a small amount of material from the cartridge before attaching the mixing tip. This type of device has also been adapted to mix and dispense temporary crown and bridge acrylic materials and cements that are used for luting and for producing restorations (Chapter 14).

Dynamic Mechanical Mixing

The device shown in Figure 8-8, C, uses a motor to drive parallel plungers, forcing the materials into a mixing tip and out into an impression tray or syringe; meanwhile, the motor-driven impeller, which is inside the mixing tip, mixes the materials as they are extruded through the tip. The function of the impeller is only to mix the materials as they are passing through; it does not propel the material. The materials are supplied in collapsible plastic bags housed in a cartridge. The amount of material retained in the mixing tip is slightly greater than that used in static mixing. In using this device, thorough mixing of higher-viscosity materials can be achieved with little effort. Both polyether and addition silicone impression materials of various viscosities are available with this dispensing system.

Making an Impression

Elastomeric impression materials are typically supplied in several viscosities to accommodate different techniques for impression making. Three techniques for making impressions are discussed in this section.

Multiple-Mix Technique

A syringe material (light body) and a tray material (heavy body) are used in this technique. Usually, the two groups of materials are mixed simultaneously, each by a different person. With the mechanical devices described earlier, the materials now can be mixed as needed by one individual. The lighter material is injected from the filled syringe or directly from a static mixing gun within and around the tooth preparation. The filled tray is then inserted in the mouth and seated over the syringe material, which has been extruded on hard and/or soft tissue. The tray material will force the syringe material to adapt to the prepared tissues. The two materials should bond together upon setting. If either material has progressed past its working time when the two materials are brought together, the bond between them will be compromised. If a partially set material is seated, it will be compressed elastically. Once removed from the mouth, the impression will “spring back” or relax, and the dies from this impression will be too narrow and too short, as illustrated in Figure 8-10.

In rare cases a clinician may attempt to repair an impression that has small defects or that lacks sufficient detail. This is usually performed by cutting away the interproximal and gingival areas of the impression. Even with proper relief of the initial impression, it will be difficult to reseat the tray precisely. Entrapment of a minute fragment of impression material or debris will eliminate any chance of a successful repair. The impression material’s surface must be roughened to ensure that the new material bonds to the set impression. The safest method is to make a new impression when bubbles or similar defects are detected in critical areas.

Monophase Technique

Medium-body polyether and addition silicone are often used for the monophase or single-viscosity technique. The procedure is similar to that of the multiple-mix technique except that only one mixture is made, and part of the material is placed in the tray, and another portion is placed in the syringe for injection in the cavity preparation, prepared teeth, or soft tissue. The success of this technique depends on the pseudoplastic (shear thinning) properties of the materials. When a medium-viscosity material is forced through the syringe tip, the viscosity is reduced to allow the material to adapt well to the preparation. Meanwhile, the material in the tray retains its medium viscosity, and, when seated, it can force the syringe material to flow past critical areas of the tooth preparation. Table 8-2 shows the effect of shear rate and elapsed time on some monophase addition silicones.


Viscosity (×104 cp) of Single-Phase Vinyl Polysiloxanes at 37 °C

Material 0.5 rpm 2.5 rpm 0.5 rpm 2.5 rpm
Baysilex (Miles) 122.1 (2.8)* 68.9 (2.5) 211.2 (14.7) 148.8 (1.2)
Green-Mouse (Parkell) 133.7 (8.9) 56.7 (2.9) 247.9 (14.9) 78.0 (2.8)
Hydrosil (Caulk) 194.2 (8.5) 129.4 (4.1) 398.1 (7.8) 153.5
Imprint (3M) 106.5 (12.2) 79.7 (2.2) 245.1 (8.9) 146.2 (5.9)
Omnisil (Coe) 156.8 (11.5) 102.5 (1.9) 347.1 (5.2) 153.5


*Numbers within parentheses represent the standard deviation of the mean.

Value at 75 s after mixing.

Value at 77 s after mixing.

From Kim K-N, Craig RG, Koran A: Viscosity of monophase addition silicones as a function of shear rate. J Prosthet Dent 67:794, 1992.

Putty-Wash Technique

This method was originally developed for condensation silicone to minimize the effect of associated dimensional changes. The thick putty material is placed in a stock tray and a preliminary impression is made. This procedure results in what is essentially an intraoral custom-made tray formed by the putty. Space for the light-body “wash” material is provided either by cutting away some of the “tray” putty or by using a thin polyethylene sheet as a spacer between the putty and the prepared teeth during preliminary impression making. One can also generate the space by vacuum forming a blank plastic sheet on a cast and then make the impression with the putty material. A mixture of the thin-consistency wash material is placed into the putty impression and on the preparation; then the tray is reseated in the mouth to make the final impression.

An alternative approach is to inject the wash material around the preparation and then immediately seat the tray with freshly mixed putty over the wash material. However, this approach risks displacing too much wash material by the putty, so that a critical area of the preparation is reproduced in the putty without the required detail. Occlusal stops should be used in the tray to avoid having the teeth penetrate through the wash or syringe material when the plastic putty mass is being seated.

When the latter technique is used, distortion or incomplete details can result because of excessive pressure applied to the setting putty. After being removed from the mouth, the pressure in the impression is released and the putty recovers its “elastic deformation.” The distortion produced by the stiff, compressible putty results in a short, narrow die (Figure 8-10). In addition to excessive pressure, some of the distortion in putty-wash impressions may be attributable to inadequate space for the wash material.

Removal of the Impression

Under no circumstances should the impression be removed until the curing has progressed sufficiently to provide adequate elasticity, so that distortion will not occur. One method for determining the time of removal is to inject some of the syringe material onto a space that is not in the field of operation before inserting the impression tray. This material can be probed with a blunt instrument from time to time; when it is firm and returns completely to its original contour, the impression is sufficiently elastic to be removed. When a multiple mix technique is used, it is advisable to test both the syringe and the tray materials in this manner. Typically, the impression should be ready for removal within at least 10 minutes from the time of mixing, allowing 6 to 8 minutes for the impression to remain in the mouth. Manufacturers usually provide the optimal time for removal after mixing.

The mechanics of removing the impression involves separation at the impression/tissue interface and stretching of the impression. The first step is to break the physical adhesion between the tissue and the impression; therefore, an impression material, such as polyether, that wets the tissue well will require extra effort to break the seal for the removal. The second step stretches the impression enough to pass under the height of contour of the hard tissue to remove the impression; therefore, using a material of higher rigidity will require a greater force to stretch the impression to facilitate removal. Polysulfide has the lowest viscosity and ranks as one of the least stiff of the elastomeric impression materials of a similar consistency. This flexibility allows the set material to be easily removed from undercut areas and from the mouth with a minimum of stress.

In addition, all elastomeric impression materials are viscoelastic, and it is necessary to use a quick snap to minimize plastic deformation of the impression during the final step of the removal process. The phenomenon of viscoelastic behavior is discussed in subsequent sections.

Preparation of Stone Casts and Dies

The hydrophobic characteristics of silicone impression materials make them suitable for pouring of epoxy resin to produce dies. However, this hydrophobicity makes pouring with gypsum products challenging, as it increases the potential of forming voids in gypsum dies and casts. There are a number of surfactant sprays, also known as debubblizers, that can improve the surface wettability of the silicone impression material for the stone slurry. Only a thin layer of surfactant should be applied to the impression surface. A dilute solution of soap is also an effective surfactant. An alternative to the use of a surfactant is to select a hydrophilized addition silicone (discussed later). Pouring of a stone cast in a polyether or polysulfide impression does not require the aid of a surfactant.

The excellent dimensional stability of addition silicone and polyether impression materials makes it possible to construct two or three casts or dies from these materials. It is also possible to construct successive stone dies or casts from polysulfide impressions when duplicate stone dies are needed. However, each successive die will be less accurate than the first die constructed from the material. The time interval between impression pours should not be greater than 30 minutes. To minimize tearing and gross distortion after the first pour, the clinician should remove the excess gypsum-forming mass from undercut areas along the periphery of the tray. Be aware that the stiffness of the impression material makes it difficult to remove the stone cast from the impression. A weak stone cast may fracture during removal.

Properties of Elastomeric Impression Materials

The goal of impression making is to produce an accurate impression that can yield a cast or die that reproduces the surface details and precise shape of the original tissue as closely as possible. Meanwhile, the dimensions of the impression should remain stable during the production of dies or casts. In this section, the properties relevant to impression making with elastomers are described.

Working and Setting Times

Table 8-3 lists working and setting times for the various kinds of elastomeric materials as measured by an oscillating rheometer. The working time, which begins at the start of mixing and ends just before the elastic properties have developed, must be greater than the time required for mixing, filling the syringe and/or tray, injecting the material on tooth preparations, and seating the tray. The setting time is the time that has elapsed from the beginning of mixing until the curing process has advanced sufficiently that the impression can be removed from the mouth with no distortion. Remember, however, that polymerization may continue for a considerable time after setting. An increase in temperature accelerates the rate of polymerization of all elastomeric impression materials; therefore, the effect of temperature on working and setting time should be taken into consideration.


Working and Setting Times of Elastomeric Impression Materials

Impression Material 23 °C 37 °C 23 °C 37 °C
Polysulfide 6.0 4.3 16.0 12.5
Condensation silicone 3.3 2.5 11.0 8.9
Addition silicone 3.1 1.8 8.9 5.9
Polyether 3.3 2.3 9.0 8.3


From Harcourt JK: A review of modern impression materials. Aust Dent J 23:178, 1978.

Working time and setting time decrease as the filler content in the materials increases. Altering the base/catalyst ratio will change the curing rate of these impression materials. Normally, having more base materials in the mixture tends to increase the working and setting times. One should be aware that this is not economical, as a portion of the paste is not used. Moreover, since the accelerator paste contains a retarder as well as a reactor, increasing the base/accelerator ratio may not produce a predictable change in the polymerization rate.

Reproduction of Oral Structure Detail

A surface reproduction test is a requirement of national standards for elastomeric impression materials. There is little doubt that these elastomers can record detail to the finest degree. When dental stone is poured on the surface of such test impressions, the finest detail is not always reproduced. The reason for this situation is that the elastomeric impression materials are capable of reproducing detail more accurately than can be transferred from the stone die or cast, which may not be capable of such accuracy.

The clinical significance of the surface reproduction tests is not entirely evident. It is possible that the detail obtained from the elastomeric impression materials under in vitro test conditions might be greater than that obtained in the mouth because of the hydrophobicity exhibited by some of these materials.

Rheological Properties

Impression materials are introduced into the mouth as viscous pastes with precisely adjusted flow properties. The viscosity and flow behavior of the unmixed components are also important in regard to the ease of mixing, air entrapment during mixing, and the tendency for the trapped air to escape before the impression is made.

Ideally, the impression material should flow freely and wet the tissue as it is being injected to achieve adaptation, and then resist flow away from the intended surface areas. The same procedure will facilitate spreading of heavy-body material on the impression tray and retain it in the tray. This phenomenon is called shear thinning (Chapter 3). Essentially, a stress-thinning material becomes less viscous when stressed as during injection and then recovers its viscosity when it rests on the tissue or or in the tray. All elastomeric impression materials exhibit shear-thinning characteristics before setting.

There are two categories of shear-thinning phenomena, pseudoplasticity and thixotropy, depending on how the material responds to the applied stress and how it behaves at rest. A pseudoplastic material displays decreasing viscosity with increasing shear stress, and recovers its vis/>

Jan 1, 2015 | Posted by in Dental Materials | Comments Off on 8: Impression Materials
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes