Under Pressure

Chronic neuropathic pain after burn injury may have multiple causes, such as direct nerve injury, nerve compression, or neuroma formation, and can significantly impair quality of life and limit functional recovery. Management includes a team-based approach that involves close collaboration between occupational and physical therapists, plastic surgeons, and experts in chronic pain, from neurology, anesthesia, psychiatry, and physiatry. Carefully selected patients with an anatomic cause of chronic neuropathic pain unequivocally benefit from surgical intervention. Self-reflection and analysis yield improvement in both efficiency and effectiveness when managing patients with burns with chronic neuropathic pain.

Key points

  • Chronic neuropathic pain in patients with burns may have an anatomic cause that is amenable to surgical intervention.

  • History and physical examination are critical in identifying the location of potential nerve compression or injury in patients with burns.

  • The surgical management of neuropathic pain can serve as a viable model for practice-based learning and improvement in the care of patients with burns.

Introduction

Can’t we give ourselves one more chance? Why can’t we give love that one more chance?

Patients with burns often develop debilitating pruritus, paresthesias, and allodynia, as well as motor dysfunction, despite medical and pharmacologic therapy. Peripheral nerve decompression has emerged as a potentially effective intervention to alleviate these symptoms, but many questions remain, regarding surgical indications, timing, and technique. For example, our own experience in abdominal wall reconstruction has shown that learning curves contain both incremental and disruptive inflection points, which can represent volatile periods of evolution in the synthesis of surgical algorithms. Phases of technical innovation versus development represent distinctly different periods of learning for surgeons, marked by contrasting periods of feasibility and proficiency.

Practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) is an educational model that was adopted by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education in 1999 as one of 6 core competencies designed to help establish the basic skills and attributes of practicing physicians. These competencies, which also include medical knowledge, patient care, professionalism, team work and communication, and systems-based practice, were later incorporated by the American Board of Medical Specialties into their program of Maintenance of Certification, to promote and ensure self-directed, lifelong learning.

Because burn care, like all of medicine, is constantly evolving, plastic surgeons are exposed to new information and new clinical scenarios almost daily. PBLI should enable practicing physicians to become efficient, as knowledge is gained, and effective, as this knowledge is applied to real-life situations. As a formal paradigm, PBLI includes 3 components for physicians to pursue:

  • Investigate and evaluate physicians’ own patient care practices, with rigorous comparison with standard of care, as well as the state-of-the-art care

  • Appraise, analyze, and assimilate scientific evidence, both within physicians’ individual practices, and across the published literature of their peers

  • Improve the practice of medicine by physicians applying new knowledge and by educating all of the stakeholders, including themselves and their colleagues, patients and their families, and other members of the health care team

This article shows the utility of PBLI in the care of patients with burns. Although there are some reports of learning-curve analyses in burn care, surprisingly little is published with regard to the application of PBLI to the care that is provided to patients with burns. As a content area for PBLI, this article discusses a complex, clinical situation that is poorly understood, the development of chronic neuropathic pain and sensorimotor dysfunction after burn injury, but that profoundly affects quality of life and both the trajectory and end points of recovery. The authors’ intuition suggested that, over the past 5 years, from 2011 to 2015, the number of procedures we were performing for neuropathic was increasing, and our outcomes were improving, compared with the first 10 years of the senior surgeon’s practice, from 2000 to 2010. Specifically, what role does the learning curve play in affecting these outcomes? Can PBLI be applied to measure disruptive versus incremental change, innovation, and subsequent development of a procedure, and attaining competency, proficiency, and ultimately mastery of a set of surgical techniques? In addition, what is the gap in what is known and what needs to be known, in order to provide the best care possible to patients?

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Nov 21, 2017 | Posted by in Dental Materials | Comments Off on Under Pressure
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes