Abstract
Introduction
Virtual reality glasses can be used as a distraction method in dental practices for children. This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of virtual reality glasses used during tooth extraction and extirpation treatment under local anesthesia on anxiety and fear in children aged 7–10 years.
Methods
This study is a randomized controlled trial. The sample of the study consisted of 120 seven to ten-year-old children, including 60 in the EG and 60 in the CG, who received tooth extraction and extirpation treatment in the pediatric dental clinic. Data collection tools included the Children’s Fear Scale, the Child Anxiety Scale-State. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, t -test, Shapiro-Wilk, mean and percentage distributions.
Results
The assessments made by the researcher and the children indicated a statistically significant difference between experimental and control groups in terms of their mean anxiety and fear scores following tooth extraction and extirpation treatment (p < 0.001). After tooth extraction and extirpation treatment, it was determined that the children in the EG had lower mean anxiety and fear scores than the children in the CG.
Conclusion
It was found that virtual reality glasses used during tooth extraction and extirpation treatment in children aged 7–10 years were effective in reducing their anxiety and fear levels. Virtual reality glasses can be used as a distracting method to relieve children’s anxiety and fears during dental treatment procedures.
1
Introduction
Diseases related to oral and dental health (ODH) are well-known global health problems in children [ ]. It has been reported that more than 530 million children worldwide have untreated caries in their primary teeth and that the prevalence of this disease increases with age [ ]. The treatment of ODH-related diseases between the ages of 5–19 frequently includes tooth extraction and extirpation treatment [ , ]. Dental treatment can trigger anxiety and fear in children, cause them to feel more pain, and may result in avoiding treatment [ ]. Some studies have shown that anxiety and fear levels in children are significantly high during dental treatment [ , ]. This may have psychological, cognitive, and behavioral consequences. The presence of anxiety and fear in children especially hinders growth and development, weakens the immune system, decreases body resistance, thereby paving the way for the development of diseases, and affects health-related behaviors [ ]. Reducing the child’s anxiety and fear of dental treatment is very important not only to alleviate the anxiety and fear at that moment but also to prevent this situation from continuing into adulthood [ , ].
One of the most used methods to relieve anxiety and fear during dental treatment in children includes distraction [ ]. The method of distracting attention helps the person focus on another stimulus and therefore avoid negative emotions and thoughts [ ]. Virtual reality (VR) applications have recently been used as a tool in the distraction method and are frequently utilized in the field of health [ ]. They are also used in dental treatment in children as in many areas of health [ ]. According to some studies, children in intervention groups who use virtual reality during dental treatment have lower anxiety and fear levels compared to children in control groups, therefore it is an effective distraction method [ ]. A review of the literature has shown that there are few studies on how VR glasses utilized in pediatric oral health procedures impact the level of patients’ fear and anxiety [ , ].
The application of VR glasses will be an option among distraction methods, especially for nurses, dentists, and healthcare professionals, to relieve children’s anxiety and fears. Dentists help the child and family adjust to oral and dental treatment [ ]. However, therapeutic health services, especially preventive ones in ODH, must be carried out painstakingly [ , ]. The success of these health services is possible with good teamwork. Nurses who are part of this team have very important roles and responsibilities [ ]. These roles and functions include the provision of education on how to look after ODH, pediatric patients’ oral diagnosis, the nursing care provided for oral care and dental treatment [ , , ]. Nurses working in the ODH center are given duties, such as preparing materials for dental treatment, assisting the dentist during the treatment, cleaning and sterilizing the instruments used during the procedure, obtaining information about the patient’s ODH, and controlling the stock of materials [ ]. It has been determined that the roles and responsibilities of nurses in ODH have been significantly neglected, especially in this process [ , , ]. Professional nurses can use the nursing process to assess individuals during the protection of ODH and the process of treatment. In addition, they may conduct suitable interventions based on a care plan they will create following their diagnosis [ , ]. In this process, nurses can plan nursing interventions to reduce children’s anxiety and fears and ensure evidence-based care practice [ ].
In conclusion, it has been observed that VR glasses used in ODH procedures positively affect children’s anxiety and fear levels, but a review of the literature has shown that there is limited research into the impact of VR glasses employed in extirpation treatment and tooth extraction on the level of children’s fear and anxiety [ ]; therefore, more studies are needed.
1.1
Study aim and hypothesis
This study was performed to determine how VR glasses utilized in extirpation treatment and tooth extraction performed with local anesthesia affected fear and anxiety in pediatric patients aged between seven and ten. The hypotheses of this research are as follows.
2
Materials and methods
2.1
Study design and sample
The research was designed as a randomized controlled experimental study. Seven-to-eight-year-old children who presented to the pediatric dental clinic of an ODH center affiliated with the Ministry of Health in the east of Turkey for tooth extraction and extirpation treatment made up the study population. The number of samples to be recruited for each group was estimated on the GPOWER 3.1 software as 33 for dependent groups t -test analysis, by taking a power value of 80%, a significance level of 0.05, an effect size of 0.15. Considering 10% attrition, it was planned to sample a total of 80 children, 40 in each group. Eventually, a total of 120 children, 60 in each group, were included in the research to reveal the association of the variables more clearly and because the number of volunteering children was high. This study was carried out between September and December 2023. The CONSORT checklist was used in the study [ ]. According to the inclusion criteria, seven-to-eight-year-old children who had no cognitive development problems, could read and write, volunteered to join the research, and submitted written consent and their fathers and/or mothers were taken to the research. Exclusion criteria were determined as children who quit during the research, did not agree to join the study, or had hearing and sight problems that might hinder the use of VR glasses.
2.2
Randomization
For the randomization of the study, stratified randomization that included tooth extraction and extirpation treatment in 7-10-year-old children was applied, which was followed by quadruple block randomization using a simple random numbers table (EECC, ECCE, CECE, DKDK, CCEE, CEEC). The sample comprised 135 children. These children were evaluated for eligibility and 12 were excluded due to refusing to participate in the study (n = 5) and sight and hearing problems (n = 7). Three EG children wanted to remove their VR glasses while the intervention was in progress. The final sample consisted of 120 children. Fig. 1 shows the CONSORT chart of the research.

2.3
Measurements
2.3.1
Child and family information form
The items on this form was about the child’s gender, age, parents’ age, employment, education level, and economic status, how many times a day the child brushed teeth, and whether the child had a disease that required constant medical check-up.
2.3.2
Children’s fear scale (CFS)
This scale was created to measure the level of fear in children by McMurtry et al. (2011). The CFS is applied by showing the child five different facial expressions ranging between an unresponsive expression, which is assigned 0 points showing no fear, and a frightened face, which is assigned four points indicating severe fear. The scale is applied to children between the ages of five and ten and has been reported to be a reliable measure to assess children’s fears before and during a medical procedure. The level of fear is directly proportional to the score given, and the higher the score is, the higher the fear level is [ ]. Gerçeker et al. (2018) performed its Turkish validity and reliability test [ ].
2.3.3
Child Anxiety Scale-State (CAS-S)
The CAS-S is utilized to evaluate anxiety in children in clinical settings. It is shaped like a thermometer, with a bulb at the bottom and ascending horizontal lines with intervals. To measure state anxiety, children are asked, “How are you feeling right now?” and to mark a point on the scale. A transparent meter with ½ point increments is placed over the child’s rating, then the ½ point increment is rounded to the nearest number. Scores range from 0 to 10. Gerçeker et al. (2018) studied the psychometric properties of the measure in the Turkish population [ ].
2.4
Application tools
Virtual Reality Glasses (VR) were used as the application tool in the research. Participants participated in the experiment using Samsung Gear VR and Samsung Galaxy S7 mobile phones. Samsung Gear VR is a head-mounted virtual reality device that provides an immersive virtual reality. There is a place for a headset to provide immersive VR. A list of 10 cartoons, some of which are the same for age and gender groups, was prepared to be presented to expert opinion. The cartoons selected for the 3D virtual environment for girls aged 7–10 are; Elsa Snow Queen, Happy Bear, Rafadan Tayfa, Esrarengiz Kasaba, Masha and Kocaayı, and the cartoons selected for boys aged 7–10 are Rafadan Tayfa, Dinosaur T-Rex, Happy Bear, Esrarengiz Kasaba, SpongeBob. A list of a total of 10 cartoons, some of which are the same for age and gender groups, was prepared to be submitted to eight experts, including three from the field of child health and disease nursing, one expert in the field of pediatric dentistry and four psychologists, to calculate the content validity ratio (CVR) and the content validity index (CVI). They were asked to rate each item using the following options: “appropriate,” “appropriate but should be corrected,” and “not appropriate.” As a result of expert opinions, the item-level content validity index was found to range from 0.89 to 1.00, and the list-level (total) content validity index was determined to be 0.97. Both the item-level and the scale-level content validity indices are expected to be > 0.80 [ ]. Index values showed that interrater agreement was established, the list was appropriate for the objective, and that content validity was ensured. The cartoons in the content-validated list were downloaded to the researcher’s mobile phone. The children in the study watched the cartoon of their choice through virtual reality glasses connected to the mobile phone with the cartoons.
2.5
Implementation of the study
The child and parent descriptive data form was filled out after the children’s consent was taken. Then, the CAS-S and the CFS were applied to the EG children 10 min before the intervention. Both the children and the researcher evaluated the measures. After these preliminary tests were carried out, a cartoon that the child liked and wanted to watch during the procedure was opened from the smart phone records of the experimental group, placed on the VR glasses and placed on the child’s eyes. The experimental group was shown cartoons with VR glasses during the procedure. After the procedure, the VR glasses were removed and the final test was performed 10 min after the procedure was completed. After the preliminary tests of the control group were performed, standard treatment practices were continued throughout the procedure. The final test was administered 10 min after the standard treatment was completed. In addition, before starting the procedure, the gums or the inside of the cheeks of the children in both the experimental and control groups were numbed with local anesthetic. The teeth of the children with completely decayed teeth were extracted, and if necessary, filling material was placed in the decayed and weakened parts of the teeth and the remaining tooth tissue.
2.6
Data analysis
Statistical calculations were done on the SPSS (V24.0) software. The normality of the data was evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables according to groups, the t -test was employed to compare continuous data, and percentages and means were utilized to evaluate the subjects’ demographic characteristics. Inter-group examinations of anxiety and fear scores were done using the independent group’s t -test, intra-group examinations were performed via dependent group’s t -test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
2.7
Ethics committee approval
Necessary permissions for the scales used in the research were obtained from the scale owners via e-mail. Ethics committee approval was obtained from the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of the University (IRB approval no: 2023/61-1). Necessary institutional permissions were obtained from the Provincial Health Directorate where the study was conducted (permission no: E−88488835-433.02-216862634). During the data collection process, the purpose of the study was explained, written and verbal consent of parents and children was obtained. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was enrolled in the Clinical Trials database (NCT06315816).
3
Results
The examination of the descriptive features of the children whose teeth were extracted yielded the following results. Mean age was 9.10 ± 1.18 in the EG and 9.33 ± 1.06 in the CG, 63.3% of the EG and 53.3% of the CG were female, and 36.7% of the EG and 46.7% of the CG were male. The groups was not different from each other regarding gender, age, parents’ education level, father’s employment status, economic status, and tooth brushing status, which showed they were homogeneous (p > 0.05; Table 1 ).
Descriptive characteristics | Experimental Group | Control Group | χ 2/t | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M±SD | M±SD | |||||
Age | 9.10 ± 1.18 | 9.33 ± 1.06 | −0.804 | 0.425 | ||
n | % | n | % | |||
Gender | 0.617 | 0.432 | ||||
Female | 19 | 63.3 | 16 | 53.3 | ||
Male | 11 | 36.7 | 14 | 46.7 | ||
Mother’s education | 8.168 | 0.086 | ||||
Elementary school | 6 | 20.0 | 6 | 20.0 | ||
Middle school | 7 | 23.3 | 6 | 20.0 | ||
High school | 5 | 16.7 | 6 | 20.0 | ||
University | 6 | 20.0 | 12 | 40.0 | ||
Graduate | 6 | 20.0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
Father’s education | 4.596 | 0.331 | ||||
Elementary school | 6 | 20.0 | 6 | 20.0 | ||
Middle school | 6 | 20.0 | 6 | 20.0 | ||
High school | 7 | 23.3 | 8 | 26.7 | ||
University | 7 | 23.3 | 10 | 33.3 | ||
Graduate | 4 | 13.3 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
Father’s employment | 1.714 | 0.190 | ||||
Yes | 15 | 50.0 | 20 | 66.7 | ||
No | 15 | 50.0 | 10 | 33.3 | ||
Economic status | 0.105 | 0.949 | ||||
Income = expenses | 18 | 60.0 | 17 | 56.7 | ||
Income > expenses | 6 | 20.0 | 7 | 23.3 | ||
Income < expenses | 6 | 20.0 | 6 | 20.0 | ||
Tooth brushing | 2.918 | 0.232 | ||||
More than once a day | 10 | 33.3 | 16 | 53.3 | ||
Once a day | 17 | 56.7 | 13 | 43.3 | ||
A few times a week | 3 | 10.0 | 1 | 3.3 |

Stay updated, free dental videos. Join our Telegram channel

VIDEdental - Online dental courses


