One in 4 American children have been abused and up to 5 children die per day from abuse. Children are vulnerable and error or lag in diagnosis may lead to further injury or death. In contrast, misdiagnosis of abuse is also unacceptable. Burns are a leading cause of abuse-related fatality and determination of cause can be difficult. It is critical that clinicians distinguish between burns of abuse (inflicted) and neglect and those received accidentally (noninflicted). Discordant narratives, use of alcohol and illicit substances, characteristics of the burn wound, and concomitant injury are all red flags for inflicted and negligent burns.
Key points
- •
Child abuse is common, affecting 1 in 4 children, and is underreported.
- •
Burn injury is a common form of lethal child abuse.
- •
Establishing the cause of burn injury (ie, inflicted, noninflicted, or negligent) is challenging.
- •
Detailed examination of the burn wound, including source, location, depth, size, margins, and concomitant injury, helps to determine the cause.
- •
Multidisciplinary care teams involving pediatricians who specialize in child abuse, social and welfare services, and law enforcement are critical for thorough investigations of abuse.
Background
The physical stigmata of child abuse were first described in 1946 by pediatric radiologist John Caffey. He described a cluster of physical findings, including multiple metaphyseal fractures, subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhage, in what he termed “whiplash shaken-baby syndrome.” It was not until 20 years later that Kempe and colleagues’ description of battered child syndrome brought national awareness to pediatric abuse, its spectrum of manifestations, and the frequently severe sequelae. Subsequently, all 50 states implemented laws requiring health care providers to report suspicions of abuse and neglect.
Numerous studies have determined that 1 in 4 children in the United States experience some form of physical abuse during childhood, with as many as 5 deaths per day as a result of these injuries. Despite these high numbers, the problem is underreported. As many as 50% of abuse-related injuries and fatalities are misdiagnosed or not properly reported to local and state agencies.
Complex nuances and variations between cases make it difficult to consistently diagnose abuse with an appropriate degree of confidence. Discerning injury mechanism is difficult, and, given the associated risks of an incorrect determination of inflicted versus noninflicted injuries, it is critical that children receive evidence-based evaluations and interventions. Up to 30% of children returned to abusive homes experience ongoing abuse. In contrast, and more difficult to measure, children who sustain noninflicted injuries may be wrongly removed from their families.
Compared with other forms of child abuse, negligent and inflicted burns are a particularly difficult diagnostic problem. Burns were not recognized in the literature as manifestations of child neglect or abuse until battered child syndrome was described in 1962. Burns are a leading cause of abuse-related fatalities in children (6%–20%), thus it is critical to discern negligent and inflicted presentation patterns.
Background
The physical stigmata of child abuse were first described in 1946 by pediatric radiologist John Caffey. He described a cluster of physical findings, including multiple metaphyseal fractures, subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and retinal hemorrhage, in what he termed “whiplash shaken-baby syndrome.” It was not until 20 years later that Kempe and colleagues’ description of battered child syndrome brought national awareness to pediatric abuse, its spectrum of manifestations, and the frequently severe sequelae. Subsequently, all 50 states implemented laws requiring health care providers to report suspicions of abuse and neglect.
Numerous studies have determined that 1 in 4 children in the United States experience some form of physical abuse during childhood, with as many as 5 deaths per day as a result of these injuries. Despite these high numbers, the problem is underreported. As many as 50% of abuse-related injuries and fatalities are misdiagnosed or not properly reported to local and state agencies.
Complex nuances and variations between cases make it difficult to consistently diagnose abuse with an appropriate degree of confidence. Discerning injury mechanism is difficult, and, given the associated risks of an incorrect determination of inflicted versus noninflicted injuries, it is critical that children receive evidence-based evaluations and interventions. Up to 30% of children returned to abusive homes experience ongoing abuse. In contrast, and more difficult to measure, children who sustain noninflicted injuries may be wrongly removed from their families.
Compared with other forms of child abuse, negligent and inflicted burns are a particularly difficult diagnostic problem. Burns were not recognized in the literature as manifestations of child neglect or abuse until battered child syndrome was described in 1962. Burns are a leading cause of abuse-related fatalities in children (6%–20%), thus it is critical to discern negligent and inflicted presentation patterns.
Terminology
Pediatric burn injury is grouped into 3 categories: noninflicted, negligent, and inflicted. Often clinicians group negligent and inflicted burns under the umbrella term of abuse. However, the circumstances under which negligent and inflicted burns occur are distinct. Negligent burns occur in the setting of inadequate knowledge, attention, or resources (an act of omission), whereas inflicted burns occur because of the action of a caregiver (an act of commission). Differentiation between these two burn causes is essential from a child welfare perspective because it dictates intervention. Table 1 provides key characteristics of negligent and inflicted burns.
Burn Features | Negligent (%) | Inflicted (%) |
---|---|---|
Historical Details | ||
Historical inconsistency | 27 | 78 a |
Burn Pattern | ||
Bilateral | 33 | 67 a |
Burn Location | ||
Lower legs | 3 | 22 a |
Concomitant Injuries | ||
Fracture | 3 | 13 a |
Hematoma | 3 | 13 a |
Postadmission Interventions | ||
Split-thickness skin graft applied | 33 | 66 a |
When grouping the 2 causes for brevity or convenience, it is most appropriate to use the term maltreatment. In addition, care must be taken to avoid the use of identifiers such as intentional when describing burns because this is a legal term and requires proof of motive or intent.
Patient Presentation and Evaluation
Characteristic presentations and patterns often accompany neglect and inflicted causes ( Fig. 1 ). Cases with single-parent providers, historical inconsistencies, delayed presentations, genital and perineal injuries, immersion lines or circumferential burns, clearly defined contact wounds, and concomitant or variably aged injuries are strong indicators that the burns resulted from negligent or inflicted causes ( Table 2 ).
Classic Features | Noninflicted | Negligent | Inflicted |
---|---|---|---|
Historical Details | |||
Historical inconsistency (%) | 0 | 27 a | 78 a |
Delay seeking care (%) | 2 | 17 a | 28 a |
Burn age at presentation (h) | 4 ± 1 | 18 ± 7 a | 28 ± 6 a |
Single parent (%) | 48 | 87 a | 87 a |
Prior child welfare history (%) | 8 | 40 a | 50 a |
Burn Mechanism | |||
Tap water (%) | 20 | 56 a | 70 a |
Burn Pattern | |||
Immersion lines/circumferential (%) | 4 | 17 a | 38 a |
Bilateral (%) | 23 | 33 a | 69 a |
Concomitant injuries (%) | 0 | 10 a | 28 a |
Burn history
During the initial history and physical examination, it is critical to evaluate for negligent and inflicted burns. Components of the burn history should include:
- •
Preceding events
- •
Setting of injury
- •
Sequence of events during burn injury
- •
Status of patient’s clothing
- •
Burn source
- •
Time and temperature of exposure
- •
First aid administration
- •
Initial burn appearance
- •
Interpretation of severity
- •
Time from injury to medical care
Historical inconsistencies should raise suspicions for maltreatment burns. History from multiple sources is valuable and documentation is critical. Only 10% of noninflicted cases reveal inconsistency, whereas 78% of patients with inflicted burns and 27% of patients with negligent burns do (see Table 2 ). Caregivers likely falsify their stories to avoid punishment but injured children may also report an untrue history because of fear of retaliation or relocation. Following discovery of historical inconsistences, the health care team must collaborate with local law enforcement and child welfare agencies because they often signal a need to evaluate for other signs of abuse (ie, skeletal surveys, urine and hair toxicology, field investigations).
Maltreatment burns are also associated with delayed presentation to care without sufficient reason. Although noninflicted burns may occur days before presentation, usually clear evidence exists of the use of first aid with anticipated recovery and/or receipt of outpatient medical attention.
Developmental and medical history
Close attention to the child’s physical and mental development relative to expected milestones is crucial to understand the potential for noninflicted injury (eg, pulling to stand on a stove, climbing into a tub). Incorporating knowledge of the average ages at which children can roll (3 months), sit-up (6 months), crawl (9 months), walk (12 months), and develop certain motor skills (eg, grasp and pinch) allows providers to determine whether or not a child is capable of performing the actions that a caregiver reports during the burn history ( Table 3 ). The same concept holds true for consideration of intellectual development and the capacity for a child to perform certain functions or tasks (eg, using a stove or microwave). In addition, other medical conditions, including seizure disorders, dermatologic conditions, and a prior history of trauma or surgery, may also complicate interpretation of the burn story.
Age | Gross Motor | Fine Motor | Speech/Language | Cognitive | Social/Emotional |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newborn | Primitive reflexes: step, place, Moro, Babinski, flexor posture | Primitive reflexes: grasp | Primitive reflexes: root, suck, alerts/startles to sound, variable cries | Visual focal length ∼25 cm (10″) Fix and follow slow horizontal arc Prefers contrast, colors, faces |
Bonding (parent→child) Self-regulation |
2 mo | Head steady when held, head up 45° at prone | Hands open half of the time Bats at objects |
Orients to voice Cooing |
Prefers usual caregiver Attends to moderate novelty Follows past midline |
Attachment (child→parents) Social smile |
4 mo | Sits with support Head up 90° prone, arms out Rolls front→back |
Palmar grasp Reaches and obtains items Bring objects to midline |
Laugh, squeal | Anticipates routines Purposeful sensory exploration of objects |
Turn-taking conversations Explores parents’ faces |
6 mo | Postural reflexes Sits tripod Rolls both ways |
Raking grasp Transfers hand to hand |
Babble (nonspecific) | Stranger anxiety Looks for dropped or hidden objects |
Expresses emotions Memory lasts 24 h |
9 mo | Gets from all fours→sitting Sits with hands free Pulls to stand |
Inferior pincer grasp Pokes at objects |
Mama, Dada Gestures goodbye Gesture games |
Object permanence Uncovers toy |
Separation anxiety |
12 mo | Walks a few steps Wide-based gait |
Fine pincer (fingertips) Voluntary release Throws objects Finger-feed self |
Additional words Inhibits with “No” Responds to name 1-step command with gesture |
Cause and effect Trial and error Imitates gestures and sounds Uses objects functionally |
Explore from secure base Points at wanted items Narrative memory begins |
15 mo | Walks well | Uses spoon, open-top cup Tower of 2 blocks |
Points to 1 body part 1-step command no gesture 5 words |
Looks for hidden object Experiments with toys |
Shared attention: points at interesting items Brings toys to parents |
18 mo | Stoops and recovers Runs |
Carries toys while walking Removes clothes Tower of 4 blocks Scribbles, fisted pencil grasp |
Points to object, 3 body parts 10–25 words Labels familiar objects |
Imitates housework Symbolic play with toys |
Increased independence Parallel play |
2 y | Jumps on 2 feet Up and down stairs |
Handedness established Uses fork Tower of 6 blocks Imitates vertical stroke |
Follows 2-step commands ≥50 words 2-word phrases |
New problem-solving without rehearsal | Testing limits, tantrums Negativism Possessive |
3 y | Pedals trike Upstairs alternating feet |
Undresses Toilet trained (2.5–3.5 y) Draws circles Turns pages of books |
3-step commands 200 words 3–4 word phrases Knows name, age, gender |
Simple time concepts Identifies shapes Compares 2 items Counts to 3 |
Separates easily Sharing, empathy Cooperative play Role play |
4 y | Hops on 1 foot Down stairs with alternating feet |
Cuts shapes with scissors Uses buttons |
Sentences Tells stories Past tense |
Counts to 4 Opposites Identifies 4 colors |
Has preferred friend Elaborate fantasy play |
5 y | Balance on 1 foot for 10 s Skips, may learn to bicycle |
Draws person Tripod pencil grasp Independent ADLs |
5000 words Future tense Word play, jokes Phonemic awareness |
Counts to 10 Recite ABCs Preliteracy |
Has group of friends Follows group rules Games with rules |

Stay updated, free dental videos. Join our Telegram channel

VIDEdental - Online dental courses


