Editor’s response

Before we received the response from the authors of the “Clinician’s corner” article (Bisinelli JC, Ioshii S, Retamoso LB, Moysés ST, Moysés SJ, Tanaka OM. Conservative treatment of unicystic ameloblastoma. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:396-400) to Dr Ide’s letter, I consulted with two reviewers with expertise in maxillofacial radiology and oral pathology. After reading the original article and the letter to the editor, the maxillofacial radiologist noted that, “from the radiographs, the lesion is not a typical unicystic ameloblastoma. I think Dr Ide has provided the evidence to support his points in the letter.” The oral pathologist reviewed the histologic photographs, Figure 2, C and D , confirming that “they are most consistent with an adenomatoid odontogenic tumor.”

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Apr 13, 2017 | Posted by in Orthodontics | Comments Off on Editor’s response
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes