Early changes in condylar position after mandibular advancement: a three-dimensional analysis

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a three-dimensional (3D) assessment of positional changes of the mandibular condyle after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). A prospective evaluation of 22 skeletal class II patients who underwent a BSSO for mandibular advancement was performed. Pre- and postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans were taken. Using the cranial base as a stable reference, the pre- and postoperative 3D skull models were superimposed virtually. Positional changes of the condyles were assessed with a 3D colour mapping system (SimPlant O&O). A Brunner–Langer statistical test was applied to test the null hypothesis that the condylar position remains stable after BSSO. The level of significance was set at 0.05. The mean mandibular advancement in the studied sample was 6.7 ± 1.6 mm. Overall, the condylar positional changes after BSSO for mandibular advancement were statistically significant ( P < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between the displacement of the left condyle and the amount of mandibular advancement ( P < 0.01). The results of this study suggest that statistically significant changes of condylar position occur after mandibular advancement. Long-term evaluation is needed to assess the capacity of the temporomandibular joint to adapt to these changes.

Significant skeletal dysplasia in non-growing patients is efficiently managed with orthognathic surgery and orthodontics. In the particular case of mandibular hypoplasia, the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is the most common surgical technique for mandibular advancement.

A higher prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) has been identified in patients with underlying malocclusion, especially in the context of mandibular hypoplasia and Angle class II malocclusion. While orthognathic surgery will correct a skeletal base discrepancy, there is ongoing concern about its potential beneficial/deleterious effects on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Although many studies have reported an improvement in TMD symptoms after orthognathic surgery, others have detected postoperative worsening of these symptoms. In a systematic review on the influence of orthognathic surgery on TMD, Abrahamsson et al. concluded that there is insufficient scientific evidence to assess TMD before and after surgery and that well-designed studies are needed in this regard.

In this context, the investigation of possible changes in condylar position and in the disc–condyle relationship after orthognathic surgery is particularly relevant. There is currently no consensus in relation to this. Several study groups have claimed that no statistically significant changes in condylar position occur after surgery. Conversely, Bailey et al. detected condylar position changes after surgery in 5–10% of the patients who underwent surgical advancement of the mandible. The percentage of observable TMJ changes after BSSO was substantially higher in the study by Saka et al., especially when a splint was not used (54%). It has been suggested that if these changes are small enough, they could allow adaptive remodelling without any TMJ damage. It seems that physiological adaptation may fit small changes in condylar position, but that this process requires a long time.

At any rate, if positional changes do occur, their significance is poorly understood. Positional modifications could promote relapse, TMJ problems, or condylar resorption. Regarding the latter, Arnett et al. showed that posteriorization and medial or lateral torquing during orthognathic surgery could cause morphological changes and lead to progressive condylar resoption. In order to minimize this possible movement of the condyles, some authors have advocated the use of different condylar positioning devices during surgery. However, these devices have not been proven to improve condylar positioning when compared to a control group. Consequently, there is currently no scientific evidence to support their use in orthognathic surgery.

The introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging has provided an accurate tool to evaluate condylar position. X-ray films have important limitations in terms of precision and the assessment of mediolateral movements. Conversely, CBCT enables a comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the TMJ, provides highly accurate linear measurements, and permits superimposition of pre- and postoperative situations.

The aim of the present study was to apply CBCT technology to evaluate postoperative changes in the TMJ condyle after BSSO for mandibular advancement. In addition, the potential effect of several patient-related and process-related variables on condylar displacement was assessed.

Patients and methods

A prospective radiological evaluation of 22 consecutive patients who underwent BSSO for mandibular advancement at a maxillofacial surgery institute in Barcelona, Spain was performed. The usual imaging protocol for orthognathic surgery cases was followed: CBCT scans were taken pre- and postoperatively (15 days after surgery). This study followed the Declaration of Helsinki on medical protocol and ethics and was approved by the necessary ethics committees.

Patients were selected on the basis of the following inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, skeletal class II profile in need of surgical correction, no history of TMD, and signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria were skeletal dysplasia requiring additional surgical procedures (i.e., maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy, surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion, etc.), asymmetry, congenital anomalies, history of trauma, and absence of or disagreement with informed consent.

For each patient, the following variables were recorded: age at the time of surgery, sex, amount of mandibular advancement (mm), and type of occlusal plane rotation (clockwise vs. counter-clockwise).

All patients were operated on under general anaesthesia and controlled hypotension. The mandibular advancement procedure was performed according to the standardized BSSO technique defined by Trauner and Obwegeser and incorporating the modifications of Hunsuck and Dal Pont. The proximal (condyle-bearing) fragments were repositioned into the uppermost-anterior part of the fossa with a bidirectional manoeuvre. One single straight miniplate with two screws on each side was used to achieve fixation of the fragments. Patients left the operating room without any rigid intermaxillary fixation apart from two guiding elastics. At 15 days postoperative, a clinical examination of the TMJ was performed. At this time point, patients initiated active physiotherapy and were instructed to do maximum mouth opening exercises with the aim of gaining normal joint function.

CBCT scans were taken with an i-CAT Vision device (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). Standard scanning conditions for orthognathic surgery patients were ensured: patient breathing quietly, sitting upright, with the clinical Frankfort horizontal plane parallel to the floor, and biting on a wax-bite in centric occlusion. Preliminary data were saved in DICOM format. For image processing, a computer with the following characteristics was used: Pentium 4 Processor, 3.8 GHz, W/SP5 Windows XP Professional, 120 GB of memory, 2 GB of RAM, and a screen of 20 inches minimum. i-CAT Vision (version 1.8.0.5; Imaging Sciences International) and SimPlant O&O (Materialise Dental SL) software programs were installed on this computer for image viewing and processing, respectively.

A 3D simulation of the pre- and postoperative anatomy was performed. An appropriate mask and region of interest were defined for this purpose. Through automatic segmentation, a preview image was obtained. This was later optimized by manual segmentation, eliminating possible artefacts.

Once the 3D reconstructions of the pre- and postoperative conditions had been obtained, they were superimposed virtually in order to evaluate possible changes in condylar position in all three planes of space. Superimpositions were done using the cranial base as a stable anatomical reference, since it is assumed to remain unchanged after surgery. The software allowed for proper adjustment of the superimposed images in the three views (sagittal, coronal, and axial) in every single slice ( Fig. 1 ). Once the correct superimposition had been obtained, the relationship was saved as the ‘home position’, such that the program would always connect the two 3D reconstructions in the same relationship. Following this methodology, the program created a coded overlay colour map that enabled visual analysis and objective quantification of the changes in three dimensions ( Fig. 2 ).

Fig. 1
Superimposition of the pre- and postoperative conditions. The cranial base was used as a stable reference area to superimpose the two images and was adjusted in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes.

Fig. 2
Preoperative (grey) and postoperative (blue) superimposition. (A) 3D superimposition. (B) Mandibular advancement in axial view. (C) Mandibular condyle and mandibular ramus position in coronal view. (D) Mandibular counter-clockwise rotation in sagittal view. (E) Coded overlay colour map of the pre- and postoperative conditions. Green areas denote no change (0–0.5 mm), whereas yellow (0.5–1 mm), orange (1–1.5 mm), red (1.5–2 mm), and purple (2–2.5 mm) areas denote changes between the two situations. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

The 3D analysis of condylar position was systematized as follows: five points were defined on each condyle; these points were named anterior, posterior, superior, medial, and lateral ( Fig. 3 ).

Fig. 3
Regions of interest taken to systematize the condylar position. For each point, the highest value of the colour interval was recorded. (A) Superior point: the most superior point from a craniocaudal view. (B) Posterior point: the most posterior point from the posterior view of the 3D reconstruction. (C) Anterior point: the most anterior point from the anterior view of the 3D reconstruction. (D) Lateral point: the most external point from the lateral view. (E) Medial point: the most external point from the medial view.

Positional changes were evaluated separately for each point. Because each colour indicates an interval of change in the colour map, it was decided that the highest value of each corresponding interval would be recorded. This methodology assumed that the value ‘0’ is not possible and ensured that the highest possible change – in other words, the ‘worst possible situation’ – was assumed systematically for each point.

The data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 15.0.1 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used for the quantitative analysis. Following a Shapiro–Wilk test in which a normal distribution was ruled out, a non-parametric Brunner–Langer test was performed to test the null hypothesis that the condylar position remains stable after BSSO for mandibular advancement. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the changes in condylar position and the amount of advancement, age, and sex, and also between contralateral condyles. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results

The study sample ( N = 22) comprised 14 women (63.6%) and eight men (36.4%); their mean age at the time of surgery was 34.3 years (range 19–59 years). The mean mandibular advancement was 6.7 ± 1.6 mm. A clockwise rotation was performed in 59.1% of the patients ( n = 13) and a counter-clockwise rotation in 40.9% ( n = 9).

Table 1 displays the mean positional changes that occurred for both condyles. The overall displacement reached statistical significance ( P < 0.05).

Table 1
Changes in the different points on the left condyle and right condyle; mean and standard deviation values (SD). a
Number Mean SD Median
Left condyle
Superior 22 1.07 0.62 1.00
Anterior 22 0.95 0.46 1.00
Posterior 22 1.02 0.63 0.75
Medial 22 0.84 0.61 0.50
Lateral 22 0.95 0.57 1.00
Right condyle
Superior 22 0.86 0.49 0.50
Anterior 22 0.91 0.53 0.75
Posterior 22 1.09 0.65 1.00
Medial 22 0.77 0.43 0.50
Lateral 22 1.16 0.61 1.00

a Data are expressed in millimetres.

The descriptive analysis revealed that the greatest positional changes occurred in the posterior point, where displacement was greater than 1 mm in the right condyle for 36% of patients and in the left condyle for 32% of patients. The second greatest displacement corresponded to the lateral point. For the remaining studied points, only 15–20% of the patients showed displacements beyond 1 mm. Nevertheless, this difference was not statistically significant between measured points or between contralateral condyles.

Spearman’s correlation coefficient confirmed a positive correlation in the posterior and lateral points between the two condyles that turned out to be statistically significant ( P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). However, the concordance was low for the posterior point (kappa index, I κ = 0.277) and moderate for the lateral point ( I κ = 0.489).

Demographic variables (age and sex) showed no statistically significant influence on changes in condylar position. Conversely, occlusal plane rotation and the amount of mandibular advancement did show a statistically significant correlation with changes in condylar position. In particular, a direct positive correlation was found between condylar displacement and the amount of mandibular advancement. Interestingly, this relationship was statistically significant for the left condyle ( P < 0.01) but not for the right condyle ( P = 0.053) ( Table 2 ). Finally, a statistically significant association between the type of occlusal plane change and the movement of the condyles was found. When a clockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular complex was performed, condylar displacement was greater in the right condyle ( P < 0.05). Conversely, when a counter-clockwise rotation was done, the left condyle showed greater displacement ( P < 0.05).

Jan 16, 2018 | Posted by in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Comments Off on Early changes in condylar position after mandibular advancement: a three-dimensional analysis
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes